These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34456301)

  • 1. Acoustic Change Complex and Visually Reinforced Infant Speech Discrimination Measures of Vowel Contrast Detection.
    Cone BK; Smith S; Cheek Smith DE
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):531-544. PubMed ID: 34456301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence of Vowel Discrimination Provided by the Acoustic Change Complex.
    Cheek D; Cone B
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):855-867. PubMed ID: 31688315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Infant cortical electrophysiology and perception of vowel contrasts.
    Cone BK
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Feb; 95(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 24933411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the ACC have potential as an index of early speech discrimination ability? A preliminary study in 4-month-old infants with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Werker JF
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):e59-69. PubMed ID: 22785572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Acoustic Change Complex Compared to Hearing Performance in Unilaterally and Bilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
    van Heteren JAA; Vonck BMD; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Lammers MJW
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1783-1799. PubMed ID: 35696186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamics of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) for tone and speech tokens.
    Cone B; Whitaker R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 77(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 23722003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between mismatch response and the acoustic change complex in normal hearing infants.
    Uhler KM; Hunter SK; Tierney E; Gilley PM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Jun; 129(6):1148-1160. PubMed ID: 29635099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cortical potentials evoked by tone frequency changes can predict speech perception in noise.
    Vonck BMD; van Heteren JAA; Lammers MJW; de Jel DVC; Schaake WAA; van Zanten GA; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H
    Hear Res; 2022 Jul; 420():108508. PubMed ID: 35477512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Varying effect of noise on sound onset and acoustic change evoked auditory cortical N1 responses evoked by a vowel-vowel stimulus.
    Yaralı M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jun; 152():36-43. PubMed ID: 32302643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refining Stimulus Parameters in Assessing Infant Speech Perception Using Visual Reinforcement Infant Speech Discrimination: Sensation Level.
    Uhler KM; Baca R; Dudas E; Fredrickson T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):807-14. PubMed ID: 26554486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Consonant Duration on Formation of Consonant-Vowel Syllable Evoked Auditory Cortical Potentials.
    Yaralı M; Yağcıoğlu S
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Apr; 14(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 29092801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression on ACC Amplitude and Listener Performance.
    Kirby BJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e261-70. PubMed ID: 25951048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oddball paradigm complexity in multi-token auditory evoked potentials.
    Billings CJ; Madsen BM; Grush LD; Koerner TK; McMillan GP; Bologna WJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2022 Sep; 788():136856. PubMed ID: 36029915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Stimulus Level and Bandwidth on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):619-34. PubMed ID: 26226607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral-temporal EEG dynamics of speech discrimination processing in infants during sleep.
    Gilley PM; Uhler K; Watson K; Yoshinaga-Itano C
    BMC Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 18(1):34. PubMed ID: 28330464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic auditory processing of english words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm.
    Pettigrew CM; Murdoch BE; Ponton CW; Finnigan S; Alku P; Kei J; Sockalingam R; Chenery HJ
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):284-301. PubMed ID: 15179119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.