117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34456319)
1. Optimization of cross-calibration factor for quantitative bone SPECT without attenuation and scatter correction in the lumbar spine: head-to-head comparison with attenuation and scatter correction.
Ichikawa H; Onoguchi M; Shibutani T; Kato T; Ito T; Shimada H
Nucl Med Commun; 2021 Dec; 42(12):1404-1416. PubMed ID: 34456319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Improvement of Standardized Uptake Value Accuracy in the
Nakamura Y; Kangai Y; Abe T; Nakahara Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(9):921-931. PubMed ID: 34544916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examination of cross-calibration and concentration linearity with quantitative gallium-67 single-photon emission computed tomography: phantom experiment.
Takahashi Y; Tsuchitani T; Shibayama M; Ikeda T; Kotoura N; Kitajima K
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Dec; 13(4):385-391. PubMed ID: 32857274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitatively accurate activity measurements with a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera: Physical phantom experiments.
Pourmoghaddas A; Wells RG
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):44. PubMed ID: 26745898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effect of Misregistration between SPECT and CT Images on Attenuation Correction for Quantitative Bone SPECT Imaging].
Sakoshi M; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto T; Sato E
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(5):452-458. PubMed ID: 29780044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skeletal standardized uptake values obtained by quantitative SPECT/CT as an osteoblastic biomarker for the discrimination of active bone metastasis in prostate cancer.
Kuji I; Yamane T; Seto A; Yasumizu Y; Shirotake S; Oyama M
Eur J Hybrid Imaging; 2017; 1(1):2. PubMed ID: 29782587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification evaluation of
Huang K; Feng Y; Liu D; Liang W; Li L
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 31768820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative evaluation of single-photon emission computed tomography findings in lower extremity possible without computed tomography-based attenuation correction.
Tsuchitani T; Kitajima K; Takahashi Y; Kotoura N
Nucl Med Commun; 2021 Oct; 42(10):1097-1103. PubMed ID: 34528929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of Number of Iterations as a Reconstruction Parameter in Bone SPECT Imaging Using a Novel Thoracic Spine Phantom.
Fukami M; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto T
J Nucl Med Technol; 2021 Jun; 49(2):143-149. PubMed ID: 33361180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative accuracy of clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT using ordered-subset expectation maximization with 3-dimensional resolution recovery, attenuation, and scatter correction.
Zeintl J; Vija AH; Yahil A; Hornegger J; Kuwert T
J Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 51(6):921-8. PubMed ID: 20484423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiac
Roberts G; Lloyd JJ; Petrides GS; O'Brien JT; Thomas AJ
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2019 Dec; 6(1):015011. PubMed ID: 33438599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Influence of the Each Correction Method for the Specific Binding Ratio and Standardized Uptake Value in the Dopamine Transporter SPECT].
Shiokawa A; Onoguchi M; Shibutani T; Maeda Y; Yoneyama H; Konishi T; Wakabayashi H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(7):638-645. PubMed ID: 31327774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a calibration method using the cross-calibration factor and system planar sensitivity in quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography imaging.
Matsutomo N; Matsumoto S; Yamamoto T; Sato E
Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Dec; 10(4):439-445. PubMed ID: 28822095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone SPECT-based segmented attenuation correction for quantitative analysis of bone metastasis (B-SAC): comparison with CT-based attenuation correction.
Nakahara T; Owaki Y; Shindou T; Nakajima K; Jinzaki M
EJNMMI Res; 2019 Mar; 9(1):27. PubMed ID: 30888521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variation of Contrast Values for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Hybrid Systems with Different Correction Methods.
Tantawy HM; Abdelhafez YG; Helal NL; Saad IE
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2020; 10():58. PubMed ID: 33024613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calibration of gamma camera systems for a multicentre European ¹²³I-FP-CIT SPECT normal database.
Tossici-Bolt L; Dickson JC; Sera T; de Nijs R; Bagnara MC; Jonsson C; Scheepers E; Zito F; Seese A; Koulibaly PM; Kapucu OL; Koole M; Raith M; George J; Lonsdale MN; Münzing W; Tatsch K; Varrone A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1529-40. PubMed ID: 21468761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of standardized uptake values between
Arvola S; Jambor I; Kuisma A; Kemppainen J; Kajander S; Seppänen M; Noponen T
EJNMMI Res; 2019 Jan; 9(1):6. PubMed ID: 30680469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of iodine-123 IQ-SPECT/CT imaging compared with conventional SPECT/CT.
Shibutani T; Onoguchi M; Yoneyama H; Konishi T; Matsuo S; Nakajima K
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Feb; 33(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 30324427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of quantitative accuracy among different scatter corrections for quantitative bone SPECT/CT imaging.
Miwa K; Nemoto R; Masuko H; Yamao T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Inoue K; Onodera H
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269542. PubMed ID: 35666737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of a digital phantom developed by QIBA for harmonizing SUVs obtained from the state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems: a multicenter study.
Nakahara T; Daisaki H; Yamamoto Y; Iimori T; Miyagawa K; Okamoto T; Owaki Y; Yada N; Sawada K; Tokorodani R; Jinzaki M
EJNMMI Res; 2017 Dec; 7(1):53. PubMed ID: 28639254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
