149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34458115)
1. The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis.
Sahu SK; Nagda SJ
Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2021; 11(3):143-147. PubMed ID: 34458115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study.
Lahoti KS
Contemp Clin Dent; 2016; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 27041896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement materials.
Bennani V; Inger M; Aarts JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 24529659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health.
Al Hamad KQ; Azar WZ; Alwaeli HA; Said KN
J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Dec; 35(12):1053-8. PubMed ID: 19040582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative clinical efficacy evaluation of three gingival displacement systems.
Shrivastava KJ; Bhoyar A; Agarwal S; Shrivastava S; Parlani S; Murthy V
J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2015 Aug; 6(Suppl 1):S53-7. PubMed ID: 26604620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Disturbance of the dentinal smear layer by acidic hemostatic agents.
Land MF; Rosenstiel SF; Sandrik JL
J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jul; 72(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 8083841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.
Chandra S; Singh A; Gupta KK; Chandra C; Arora V
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 26443067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of a carbon dioxide laser on periodontally involved root surfaces.
Misra V; Mehrotra KK; Dixit J; Maitra SC
J Periodontol; 1999 Sep; 70(9):1046-52. PubMed ID: 10505808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Smear layer instability caused by hemostatic agents.
Land MF; Couri CC; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Nov; 76(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 8933436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of retraction materials on gingival health: A histopathological study.
Phatale S; Marawar PP; Byakod G; Lagdive SB; Kalburge JV
J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 14(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 20922077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of soft acidic drinks in exposing dentinal tubules after non-surgical periodontal treatment: a SEM investigation on the protective effects of oxalate-containing phytocomplex.
Sauro S; Mannocci F; Watson TF; Piemontese M; Sherriff M; Mongiorgi R
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Nov; 12(7):E542-8. PubMed ID: 17978781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Gingival Retraction Using Polyvinyl Siloxane Foam Retraction System, Vinyl Polysiloxane Paste Retraction System, and Copper Wire Reinforced Retraction Cord in Endodontically Treated Teeth: An
Mehta S; Virani H; Memon S; Nirmal N
Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(3):428-432. PubMed ID: 32308315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dentin Topographic Features following Chemomechanical Caries Removal in Primary Teeth.
Kotb RM; Elkateb MA; Ahmed AM; Kawana KY; El Meligy OA
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):472-479. PubMed ID: 27805895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of Effectiveness of Erbium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser, GentleWave Irradiation, Photodynamic Therapy, and Sodium Hypochlorite in Smear Layer Removal.
Dash S; Ismail PM; Singh J; Agwan MA; Ravikumar K; Annadurai T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1266-1269. PubMed ID: 33850073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of four cordless gingival displacement systems: A clinical study.
Rayyan MM; Hussien ANM; Sayed NM; Abdallah R; Osman E; El Saad NA; Ramadan S
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 30722986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet and diode lasers in smear layer removal and dentin permeability of root canal after biomechanical preparation - A scanning electron microscopy study.
Dhawan S; Jasuja P; Khurana H; Gakhar E; Singh H
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2020; 38(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 32174631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A scanning electron microscopic study of tooth surface changes induced by tannic acid.
Sabbak SA; Hassanin MB
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 9513103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Different Root Conditioning Agents on Periodontally Affected Root Surface: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
Jalaluddin M; Ramanna PK; Naseema DA; Alshahrani MA; Kumari V; Atom J
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):863-867. PubMed ID: 33568606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
