These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34458115)

  • 21. The Effect of Four Commonly used Root Canal Irrigants on the Removal of Smear Layer: An In-vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
    Kumar P; Prasad N; Darawade A; Bhagat SK; Narayana N; Darawade P
    J Int Oral Health; 2015 Sep; 7(9):88-93. PubMed ID: 26435625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of Aluminum Chloride Retraction Cords, Expasyl, and Tetrahydrozoline-Soaked Retraction Systems in Gingival Retraction.
    Kavita K; Sinha RI; Singh R; Singh R; Reddy KRP; Kulkarni G
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2020 Aug; 12(Suppl 1):S440-S443. PubMed ID: 33149502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of Nd:YAG laser radiation on removal of a root surface smear layer after root planing: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Ito K; Nishikata J; Murai S
    J Periodontol; 1993 Jun; 64(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 8336255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Occluding effect of Nd:YAG laser and different dentin desensitizing agents on human dentinal tubules in vitro: a scanning electron microscopy investigation.
    Al-Saud LM; Al-Nahedh HN
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):340-55. PubMed ID: 22313266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Morphological changes in hard dental tissues prepared by Er:YAG laser (LiteTouch, Syneron), Carisolv and rotary instruments. A scanning electron microscopy evaluation.
    Tsanova STs; Tomov GT
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2010; 52(3):46-55. PubMed ID: 21053673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Smear Layer Removal and Microhardness Alteration Potential of a Naturally Occurring Antioxidant - An In Vitro Study.
    Rajakumaran A; Ramesh H; Ashok R; Balaji L; Ganesh A
    Cureus; 2019 Jul; 11(7):e5241. PubMed ID: 31565639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
    Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biological Response Induced in Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts upon Exposure to Various Types of Injectable Astringent Retraction Agents.
    Nowakowska D; Kulbacka J; Wezgowiec J; Szewczyk A; Baczynska D; Zietek M; Wieckiewicz W; Saczko J
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Apr; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 33924145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative Evaluation of the Etching Pattern of Er,Cr:YSGG & Acid Etching on Extracted Human Teeth-An ESEM Analysis.
    Issar R; Mazumdar D; Ranjan S; Krishna NK; Kole R; Singh P; Lakiang D; Jayam C
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 May; 10(5):ZC01-5. PubMed ID: 27437337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement techniques.
    Bennani V; Aarts JM; He LH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):388-92. PubMed ID: 22633595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation].
    Xin Y; Yang J; Song KY
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 30854818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. EFFICIENCY OF CHELATING IRRIGATION AGENTS FOR REMOVING A LUBRICATED DENTIN LAYER OF ROOT CANAL.
    Vadachkoria O; Mamaladze M; Jalabadze N; Chumburidze T; Chipashvili N
    Georgian Med News; 2019 Apr; (289):25-29. PubMed ID: 31215874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement systems: an in-vivo study.
    Aldhuwayhi S
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Sep; 27(17):8019-8025. PubMed ID: 37750631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Impact of Expasyl® Gingival Retraction Paste on the Bond Strength of Self-etch and Total-etch Systems.
    Al Baker AM; El Araby A; Al Amri MD; Sukumaran A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):335-9. PubMed ID: 26162250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of smear layer on depth of penetration of three endodontic sealers: an SEM study.
    Kouvas V; Liolios E; Vassiliadis L; Parissis-Messimeris S; Boutsioukis A
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1998 Aug; 14(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 9796484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants.
    Al-Ani A; Bennani V; Chandler NP; Lyons KM; Thomson WM
    N Z Dent J; 2010 Sep; 106(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 20882737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of three new gingival retraction systems: a research report.
    Gupta A; Prithviraj DR; Gupta D; Shruti DP
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Mar; 13(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 24431705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An
    Thimmappa M; Bhatia M; Somani P; Kumar DRV
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 29692565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimation of cytokine levels in gingival crevicular fluid following the use of different gingival retraction systems in patients requiring fixed partial dentures - An original research.
    Mathew L; Mathew A; Saranya SK; Mohan AS
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(5):709-712. PubMed ID: 36092456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.