These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3445882)

  • 1. Visual acuity prediction using the VER--temporal aspects.
    Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC; Taylor AJ
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Dec; 64(12):888-96. PubMed ID: 3445882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binocular summation in visually evoked responses and visual acuity.
    Heravian JS; Jenkins TC; Douthwaite WA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jul; 10(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 2216474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.
    Jenkins TC; Douthwaite WA
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Dec; 65(12):957-61. PubMed ID: 3223510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The VER as a predictor of normal visual acuity in the adult human eye.
    Jenkins TC; Douthwaite WA; Peedle JE
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 4088678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual acuity prediction using the visual evoked response.
    Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):421-4. PubMed ID: 3454920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acuity predictions from visually evoked potential to checkerboard pattern reversal stimuli: the effect of reversal rate.
    Heravian SJ; Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC
    Clin Exp Optom; 1999; 82(6):244-249. PubMed ID: 12482271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visually evoked responses to checkerboard patterns: check and field size interactions.
    Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Nov; 59(11):894-901. PubMed ID: 7180932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binocular interaction with neutral density filters as measured by the visual evoked response.
    Heravian-Shandiz J; Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Oct; 68(10):801-6. PubMed ID: 1749601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual evoked response and alcohol intoxication.
    Jensen OL; Krogh E
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1984 Aug; 62(4):651-7. PubMed ID: 6485760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theoretical reliability of visual evoked response-based acuity determinations.
    Fagan JE; Yolton RL
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Feb; 62(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 3985106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis.
    Mallecourt J; Chain F; Leblanc M; Lhermitte F
    Biomedicine; 1980 Dec; 32(4):210-6. PubMed ID: 7470584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mental concentration and the pattern reversal visual evoked response.
    Douthwaite WA; Connor H
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Jan; 66(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 2927914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. First-order Wiener kernel visually evoked potentials obtained from multiple sclerosis patients.
    Schoon DV; Wong EK
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1987 Jan; 65(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 3665696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pattern reversal visual evoked response and Snellen visual acuity.
    Katsumi O; Mehta MC; Larson-Park EW; Skladzien CJ; Hirose T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1994 May; 232(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 8045436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amplitude variability of the steady-state visual evoked response (VER).
    Yolton RL; Allen RG; Goodson RA; Schafer DL; Decker WD
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1983 Aug; 60(8):694-704. PubMed ID: 6624869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of number of elements and size of stimulus field on recordability of pattern reversal visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tsukada T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1988 Jun; 29(6):922-7. PubMed ID: 3372166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. VER in optic neuritis.
    Menon V; Kumar H; Prakash P
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1989; 37(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2638307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amplitude variability of the transient visual evoked response.
    Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 3211563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective evaluation of binocular function with pattern reversal VER. IV. Effect of spatial and temporal frequency.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tanino T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1988 Apr; 66(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 3389094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Steady-state visual evoked response amplitudes and concurrent electroencephalographic activity.
    Fagan JE; Downard FG; Yolton RL
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Jun; 62(6):418-22. PubMed ID: 4014430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.