These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34458910)

  • 1. Craniofacial shape from pre- to post-adolescence.
    Maciejewska-Turek A; Bilińska M; Wellens HLL; Fudalej PS
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 May; 44(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 34458910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Geometric morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth between the ages of 12 and 14 in normal humans.
    Katsadouris A; Halazonetis DJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 27940444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphometric covariation between palatal shape and skeletal pattern in Class II growing subjects.
    Paoloni V; Lione R; Farisco F; Halazonetis DJ; Franchi L; Cozza P
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):371-376. PubMed ID: 28340178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphometric covariation between palatal shape and skeletal pattern in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study.
    Parcha E; Bitsanis E; Halazonetis DJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):377-385. PubMed ID: 27694577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shape covariation between the craniofacial complex and first molars in humans.
    Polychronis G; Halazonetis DJ
    J Anat; 2014 Aug; 225(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 24916927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the morphometric covariation between palatal and craniofacial skeletal morphology in class III malocclusion growing subjects.
    Paoloni V; Gastaldi G; Franchi L; De Razza FC; Cozza P
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 May; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32460800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How tight is the relationship between the skeletal and soft-tissue facial profile: A geometric morphometric analysis of the facial outline.
    Zedníková Malá P; Krajíček V; Velemínská J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Nov; 292():212-223. PubMed ID: 30343234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Geometric morphometric 3D shape analysis and covariation of human mandibular and maxillary first molars.
    Polychronis G; Christou P; Mavragani M; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2013 Oct; 152(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 24009105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Craniofacial shape in patients with beta thalassaemia: a geometric morphometric analysis.
    Roussos P; Mitsea A; Halazonetis D; Sifakakis I
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1686. PubMed ID: 33462286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Craniofacial shape differs in patients with tooth agenesis: geometric morphometric analysis.
    Cocos A; Halazonetis DJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):345-351. PubMed ID: 27464525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphologic variability of nonsyndromic operated patients affected by cleft lip and palate: a geometric morphometric study.
    Toro-Ibacache V; Cortés Araya J; Díaz Muñoz A; Manríquez Soto G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 25172257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Connecting the new with the old: modifying the combined application of Procrustes superimposition and principal component analysis, to allow for comparison with traditional lateral cephalometric variables.
    Wellens HL; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):569-576. PubMed ID: 26739558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selecting subjects with high craniofacial shape homogeneity for clinical trials.
    Akli E; Marinaki L; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Dec; 148(6):1026-35. PubMed ID: 26672709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variability of the cranial and dental phenotype in Williams syndrome.
    Axelsson S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (170):3-67. PubMed ID: 15762376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skeletal growth in class II malocclusion from childhood to adolescence: does the profile straighten?
    Taloumtzi M; Padashi-Fard M; Pandis N; Fleming PS
    Prog Orthod; 2020 May; 21(1):13. PubMed ID: 32419086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial growth in females 14 to 20 years of age.
    Foley TF; Mamandras AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Mar; 101(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 1539552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geometric morphometrics of different malocclusions in lateral skull radiographs.
    Freudenthaler J; Čelar A; Ritt C; Mitteröcker P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Jan; 78(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 27796401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric assessment of craniofacial morphology in patients with treacher Collins syndrome.
    Kapadia H; Shetye PR; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1141-5. PubMed ID: 23851757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Craniofacial growth in short children born small for gestational age: effect of growth hormone treatment.
    van Erum R; Mulier M; Carels C; Verbeke G; de Zegher F
    J Dent Res; 1997 Sep; 76(9):1579-86. PubMed ID: 9294492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Covariance patterns between ramus morphology and the rest of the face: A geometric morphometric study.
    Krüsi M; Halazonetis DJ; Eliades T; Koretsi V
    Korean J Orthod; 2023 May; 53(3):185-193. PubMed ID: 37113038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.