These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34459770)
1. DETECTION OF BREAST CANCERS REPRESENTED AS ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTION: A COMPARISON OF FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY AND DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS. Babkina TM; Gurando AV; Kozarenko TM; Gurando VR; Telniy VV; Pominchuk DV Wiad Lek; 2021; 74(7):1674-1679. PubMed ID: 34459770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review. Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Nonmalignant Pathology at Biopsy. Villa-Camacho JC; Bahl M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 35107312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathology results of architectural distortion on detected with digital breast tomosynthesis without definite sonographic correlate. Walcott-Sapp S; Garreau J; Johnson N; Thomas KA Am J Surg; 2019 May; 217(5):857-861. PubMed ID: 30777292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS AND FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY IN BREAST CANCER DETECTION ASSOCIATED WITH FOUR ASYMMETRY TYPES. Gurando AV; Babkina TM; Dykan IM; Kozarenko TM; Gurando VR; Telniy VV Wiad Lek; 2021; 74(4):842-848. PubMed ID: 34155990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tomosynthesis-detected Architectural Distortion: Management Algorithm with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Durand MA; Wang S; Hooley RJ; Raghu M; Philpotts LE Radiographics; 2016; 36(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 26963448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography. Bahl M; Lamb LR; Lehman CD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 28834441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion. Dibble EH; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Ward RC; Maynard AS; Mainiero MB Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28710582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience. Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial Experience of Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsies of Tomosynthesis-Detected (2D Mammography and Ultrasound Occult) Architectural Distortions. Patel BK; Covington M; Pizzitola VJ; Lorans R; Giurescu M; Eversman W; Lewin J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1395-1400. PubMed ID: 29570367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Management Algorithm and Pathological Outcome. Samreen N; Moy L; Lee CS J Breast Imaging; 2020 Sep; 2(5):424-435. PubMed ID: 38424901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathological outcome of sonographically occult architectural distortions (AD) visible only on digital breast tomosynthesis, and comparison with AD visible also on 2D mammography. Linda A; Tarricone R; Londero V; Girometti R; Zuiani C Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 146():110075. PubMed ID: 34864616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers. Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications. Clauser P; Nagl G; Helbich TH; Pinker-Domenig K; Weber M; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Baltzer PAT Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 27842661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DCIS showing architectural distortion on the screening mammogram - comparison of mammographic and pathological findings. Sekine K; Tsunoda-Shimizu H; Kikuchi M; Saida Y; Kawasaki T; Suzuki K Breast Cancer; 2007; 14(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 17690505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors Affecting Breast Cancer Detectability on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Two-Dimensional Digital Mammography in Patients with Dense Breasts. Lee SH; Jang MJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Rim J; Chang JM; Kim B; Choi HY Korean J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 30627022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of breast cancer presenting as a mass in women with dense breasts - digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography. Babkina TM; Dykan IM; Gurando AV; Suleimenova DM; Kozarenko TM; Bozhok YM; Stuley VA Exp Oncol; 2020 Sep; 42(3):215-219. PubMed ID: 32996743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial. Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection Rates for Benign and Malignant Diagnoses on Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in a Statewide Mammography Registry Study. Fujii MH; Herschorn SD; Sowden M; Hotaling EL; Vacek PM; Weaver DL; Sprague BL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Mar; 212(3):706-711. PubMed ID: 30673339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates. Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]