These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34459833)

  • 1. Social Media Polarization and Echo Chambers in the Context of COVID-19: Case Study.
    Jiang J; Ren X; Ferrara E
    JMIRx Med; 2021; 2(3):e29570. PubMed ID: 34459833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Opinion Leaders and Structural Hole Spanners Influencing Echo Chambers in Discussions About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media in China: Network Analysis.
    Wang D; Zhou Y; Ma F
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Nov; 24(11):e40701. PubMed ID: 36367965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Role of Influential Actors in Fostering the Polarized COVID-19 Vaccine Discourse on Twitter: Mixed Methods of Machine Learning and Inductive Coding.
    Hagen L; Fox A; O'Leary H; Dyson D; Walker K; Lengacher CA; Hernandez R
    JMIR Infodemiology; 2022; 2(1):e34231. PubMed ID: 35814809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unmasking the Twitter Discourses on Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic: User Cluster-Based BERT Topic Modeling Approach.
    Xu WW; Tshimula JM; Dubé È; Graham JE; Greyson D; MacDonald NE; Meyer SB
    JMIR Infodemiology; 2022; 2(2):e41198. PubMed ID: 36536763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Echo Chamber Effect in Rumor Rebuttal Discussions About COVID-19 in China: Social Media Content and Network Analysis Study.
    Wang D; Qian Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Mar; 23(3):e27009. PubMed ID: 33690145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Charting the Information and Misinformation Landscape to Characterize Misinfodemics on Social Media: COVID-19 Infodemiology Study at a Planetary Scale.
    Chen E; Jiang J; Chang HH; Muric G; Ferrara E
    JMIR Infodemiology; 2022; 2(1):e32378. PubMed ID: 35190798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dense and influential core promotion of daily viral information spread in political echo chambers.
    Asatani K; Yamano H; Sakaki T; Sakata I
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7491. PubMed ID: 33820918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polarization of the vaccination debate on Facebook.
    Schmidt AL; Zollo F; Scala A; Betsch C; Quattrociocchi W
    Vaccine; 2018 Jun; 36(25):3606-3612. PubMed ID: 29773322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social media behavior is associated with vaccine hesitancy.
    Rathje S; He JK; Roozenbeek J; Van Bavel JJ; van der Linden S
    PNAS Nexus; 2022 Sep; 1(4):pgac207. PubMed ID: 36714849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Building a Public Twitter Data Set of Antivaccine Content, Vaccine Misinformation, and Conspiracies.
    Muric G; Wu Y; Ferrara E
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Nov; 7(11):e30642. PubMed ID: 34653016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. COVID-19 Echo Chambers: Examining the Impact of Conservative and Liberal News Sources on Risk Perception and Response.
    Lachlan KA; Hutter E; Gilbert C
    Health Secur; 2021; 19(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 33470883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'.
    Darius P
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):151. PubMed ID: 36246430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The echo chamber effect on social media.
    Cinelli M; De Francisci Morales G; Galeazzi A; Quattrociocchi W; Starnini M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Mar; 118(9):. PubMed ID: 33622786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. COVID-19 and social media: Beyond polarization.
    De Nicola G; Tuekam Mambou VH; Kauermann G
    PNAS Nexus; 2023 Aug; 2(8):pgad246. PubMed ID: 37564362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partisan asymmetries in exposure to misinformation.
    Rao A; Morstatter F; Lerman K
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15671. PubMed ID: 36123387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Public Concern About Monitoring Twitter Users and Their Conversations to Recruit for Clinical Trials: Survey Study.
    Reuter K; Zhu Y; Angyan P; Le N; Merchant AA; Zimmer M
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Oct; 21(10):e15455. PubMed ID: 31670698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partisan styles of self-presentation in U.S. Twitter bios.
    Essig L; DellaPosta D
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1077. PubMed ID: 38212630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling Echo Chambers and Polarization Dynamics in Social Networks.
    Baumann F; Lorenz-Spreen P; Sokolov IM; Starnini M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Jan; 124(4):048301. PubMed ID: 32058741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Entropy-based detection of Twitter echo chambers.
    Pratelli M; Saracco F; Petrocchi M
    PNAS Nexus; 2024 May; 3(5):pgae177. PubMed ID: 38737768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The geographic embedding of online echo chambers: Evidence from the Brexit campaign.
    Bastos M; Mercea D; Baronchelli A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206841. PubMed ID: 30388169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.