BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34459983)

  • 1. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may contribute to low incidence of postoperative surgical site infection in patients with poor glycemic control.
    Yamane T; Yoshida N; Horinouchi T; Morinaga T; Eto K; Harada K; Ogawa K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Mar; 407(2):579-585. PubMed ID: 34459983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A retrospective study of preoperative malnutrition based on the Controlling Nutritional Status score as an associated marker for short-term outcomes after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Horinouchi T; Yoshida N; Harada K; Eto K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Iwagami S; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3367-3375. PubMed ID: 35976434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
    Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy on wound infection in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis.
    Guo D; Liao F; Yang L; Liu B; Chen L
    Int Wound J; 2024 Jan; 21(1):e14598. PubMed ID: 38272810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between the severity of emphysematous change in the lung and morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A retrospective study on a novel strategy for risk prediction.
    Horinouchi T; Yoshida N; Shiraishi S; Hara Y; Matsumoto C; Toihata T; Kosumi K; Harada K; Eto K; Ogawa K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Thorac Cancer; 2024 Jan; 15(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 38069606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Up-Front Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy on Quality of Life for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.
    Li Z; Cheng J; Zhang Y; Wen S; Lv H; Xu Y; Zhu Y; Zhang Z; Mu D; Tian Z
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):693-701. PubMed ID: 33503901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?
    Li J; Shen Y; Tan L; Feng M; Wang H; Xi Y; Wang Q
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 25249141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effects of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy on circulating tumor cells in patients with esophageal cancer].
    Guo X; Wu YZ; Jia LF; Li YL; Yan YS; Chen QQ
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2018 Mar; 38(3):318-323. PubMed ID: 29643038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
    van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared to Open Esophagectomy.
    Gottlieb-Vedi E; Kauppila JH; Mattsson F; Lindblad M; Nilsson M; Lagergren P; Rouvelas I; Lagergren J;
    Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):e744-e748. PubMed ID: 33480612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Open Esophagectomy on Circulating Tumor Cell Level in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Cancer.
    Wang HB; Guo Q; Li YH; Sun ZQ; Li TT; Zhang WX; Xiang SS; Li HF
    World J Surg; 2016 Jul; 40(7):1655-62. PubMed ID: 27020921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Replace Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer? Latest Analysis of 24,233 Esophagectomies From the Japanese National Clinical Database.
    Yoshida N; Yamamoto H; Baba H; Miyata H; Watanabe M; Toh Y; Matsubara H; Kakeji Y; Seto Y
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jul; 272(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 30720501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Is Associated with Superior Survival Compared to Open Surgery.
    Ising MS; Smith SA; Trivedi JR; Martin RCG; Phillips P; Van Berkel V; Fox MP
    Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):1833-1843. PubMed ID: 35317621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transition from open to minimally invasive en bloc esophagectomy can be achieved without compromising surgical quality.
    Kammili A; Cools-Lartigue J; Mulder D; Feldman LS; Ferri LE; Mueller CL
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3067-3076. PubMed ID: 32556773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
    Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.