These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34460711)

  • 1. An Efficient Method for No-Reference Video Quality Assessment.
    Agarla M; Celona L; Schettini R
    J Imaging; 2021 Mar; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 34460711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No-Reference Quality Assessment of In-Capture Distorted Videos.
    Agarla M; Celona L; Schettini R
    J Imaging; 2020 Jul; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 34460689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-Dimensional Feature Fusion Network for No-Reference Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videos.
    Jiang J; Wang X; Li B; Tian M; Yao H
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using the Temporal Statistics of Global and Local Image Features.
    Varga D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-Level Approach for No-Reference Consumer Video Quality Assessment.
    Korhonen J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Dec; 28(12):5923-5938. PubMed ID: 31247551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Completely Blind Quality Assessment of User Generated Video Content.
    Kancharla P; Channappayya SS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():263-274. PubMed ID: 34855597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using Multi-Pooled, Saliency Weighted Deep Features and Decision Fusion.
    Varga D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 35336380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatiotemporal Statistics for Video Quality Assessment.
    Xuelong Li ; Qun Guo ; Xiaoqiang Lu
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3329-3342. PubMed ID: 27187966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective and Objective Audio-Visual Quality Assessment for User Generated Content.
    Cao Y; Min X; Sun W; Zhai G
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023; 32():3847-3861. PubMed ID: 37428674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content.
    Tu Z; Wang Y; Birkbeck N; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():4449-4464. PubMed ID: 33856995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CONVIQT: Contrastive Video Quality Estimator.
    Madhusudana PC; Birkbeck N; Wang Y; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023; 32():5138-5152. PubMed ID: 37676804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CVD2014-A Database for Evaluating No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Algorithms.
    Nuutinen M; Virtanen T; Vaahteranoksa M; Vuori T; Oittinen P; Hakkinen J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3073-86. PubMed ID: 27164589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Study of the Subjective and Objective Quality of High Motion Live Streaming Videos.
    Shang Z; Ebenezer JP; Wu Y; Wei H; Sethuraman S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1027-1041. PubMed ID: 34951848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective Video Quality Assessment Combining Transfer Learning With CNN.
    Zhang Y; Gao X; He L; Lu W; He R
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2020 Aug; 31(8):2716-2730. PubMed ID: 30736007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blind Video Quality Assessment for Ultra-High-Definition Video Based on Super-Resolution and Deep Reinforcement Learning.
    Ying Z; Pan D; Shi P
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study of Spatio-Temporal Modeling in Video Quality Assessment.
    Fang Y; Li Z; Yan J; Sui X; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023; 32():2693-2702. PubMed ID: 37145945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Large-Scale Study of Perceptual Video Quality.
    Sinno Z; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 30222561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Videos.
    Yue G; Zhang L; Du J; Zhou T; Zhou W; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2024 Sep; PP():. PubMed ID: 39283779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Viewport-Based CNN: A Multi-Task Approach for Assessing 360° Video Quality.
    Xu M; Jiang L; Li C; Wang Z; Tao X
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2022 Apr; 44(4):2198-2215. PubMed ID: 33017289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting the Quality of Compressed Videos With Pre-Existing Distortions.
    Yu X; Birkbeck N; Wang Y; Bampis CG; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():7511-7526. PubMed ID: 34460374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.