These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34461074)
1. Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study. Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao MM; Cibula D; Wu X; Falconer H; Persson J; Perrotta M; Mosgaard BJ; Kucukmetin A; Berlev I; Rendon G; Liu K; Vieira M; Capilna ME; Fotopoulou C; Baiocchi G; Kaidarova D; Ribeiro R; Pedra-Nobre S; Kocian R; Li X; Li J; Pálsdóttir K; Noll F; Rundle S; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Gheorghe M; Saso S; Bolatbekova R; Tsunoda A; Pitcher B; Wu J; Urbauer D; Pareja R Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 226(1):97.e1-97.e16. PubMed ID: 34461074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study. Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao M; Cibula D; Fotopoulou C; Kucukmetin A; Rendon G; Perrotta M; Ribeiro R; Vieira M; Baiocchi G; Falconer H; Persson J; Wu X; Căpilna ME; Ioanid N; Mosgaard BJ; Berlev I; Kaidarova D; Olawaiye AB; Liu K; Nobre SP; Kocian R; Saso S; Rundle S; Noll F; Tsunoda AT; Palsdottir K; Li X; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Pareja R Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):635-638. PubMed ID: 30765489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Frumovitz M; Obermair A; Coleman RL; Pareja R; Lopez A; Ribero R; Isla D; Rendon G; Bernardini MQ; Buda A; Moretti-Marquez R; Zevallos A; Vieira MA; Zhu T; Land RP; Nicklin J; Asher R; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Ramirez PT Lancet Oncol; 2020 Jun; 21(6):851-860. PubMed ID: 32502445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trachelectomy for reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy. Matsuo K; Chen L; Mandelbaum RS; Melamed A; Roman LD; Wright JD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):469.e1-469.e13. PubMed ID: 30802438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. Melamed A; Margul DJ; Chen L; Keating NL; Del Carmen MG; Yang J; Seagle BL; Alexander A; Barber EL; Rice LW; Wright JD; Kocherginsky M; Shahabi S; Rauh-Hain JA N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1905-1914. PubMed ID: 30379613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina). Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery. Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame? Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic versus vaginal radical trachelectomy for reproductive-aged patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma: A multi-center cohort study. Nica A; Benseler A; Parbhakar A; Fortin LT; Heyns M; Lee M; Covens A; Plante M; May T Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Jun; 185():95-100. PubMed ID: 38377763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fertility sparing therapy in women with lymph node negative cervical cancer >2cm - oncologic and fertility outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical vaginal trachelectomy. Plaikner A; Siegler K; Hertel H; Jacob A; Petzel A; Schubert M; Blohmer JU; Böhmer G; Marnitz S; Ragosch V; Domröse C; Oppelt P; Jülicher A; Schneider A; Willems A; Favero G; Köhler C Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Oct; 33(10):1542-1547. PubMed ID: 37696645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Casarin J; Bogani G; Papadia A; Ditto A; Pinelli C; Garzon S; Donadello N; Laganà AS; Cromi A; Mueller M; Raspagliesi F; Ghezzi F J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 32320800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2-IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome. van Gent MD; van den Haak LW; Gaarenstroom KN; Peters AA; van Poelgeest MI; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):735-43. PubMed ID: 24651626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Type B Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Early Cervical Cancer. Martel-Billard C; Faller E; Delaine M; Boisramé T; Baldauf JJ; Akladios CY J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):14-15. PubMed ID: 27298263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis. Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival of women with microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix is not improved by radical surgery. Bean LM; Ward KK; Plaxe SC; McHale MT Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):332.e1-332.e6. PubMed ID: 28522318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm. Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]