These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34461603)

  • 21. Utilization and Impact of Social Media in Hand Surgeon Practices.
    Garofolo G; Akinleye SD; Golan EJ; Choueka J
    Hand (N Y); 2020 Jan; 15(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 30003808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlates of Google Search Rankings for Spine Surgeons: An Analysis of Academic Pedigree, Social Media Presence, and Patient Ratings.
    Chiu RG; Parola R; Nallani A; Glastris G; Siddiqui N; Bheri A; Shah M; Behbahani M; Mehta AI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Oct; 45(19):1376-1381. PubMed ID: 32453226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Social Media in Hip Arthroscopy Is an Underused Resource That Enhances Physician Online Reputation.
    Hodakowski AJ; McCormick JR; Patel MS; Pang C; Yi D; Rea PM; Perry AK; Nho SJ; Chahla J
    Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2022 Apr; 4(2):e349-e357. PubMed ID: 35494268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website.
    Emmert M; McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e24229. PubMed ID: 34309579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Content and Nature of Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of 849 Comments.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Sep; 21(9):e14336. PubMed ID: 31573918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews.
    Bakhsh W; Mesfin A
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Aug; 43(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 25136868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Social media use by shoulder and elbow surgeons increases the number of ratings on physician review websites.
    McCormick JR; Patel MS; Hodakowski AJ; Rea PM; Naik KP; Cohn MR; Mehta N; Damodar D; Abboud JA; Garrigues GE
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Dec; 30(12):e713-e723. PubMed ID: 34343661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons.
    Velasco BT; Chien B; Kwon JY; Miller CP
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Feb; 13(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 30795702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Association Between Social Media Activity and Ratings on Physician Review Websites Among Orthopaedic Surgeons With an Active Online Media Presence.
    Kerzner B; Dasari SP; Swindell HW; Obioha OA; Khan ZA; Rea PM; Fortier LM; Haynes MS; Chahla J
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2024 Feb; 12(2):23259671231209794. PubMed ID: 38332847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors Impacting Online Ratings for Otolaryngologists.
    Calixto NE; Chiao W; Durr ML; Jiang N
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Aug; 127(8):521-526. PubMed ID: 29882425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of Internet Review Site Comments for Spine Surgeons: How Office Staff, Physician Likeability, and Patient Outcome Are Associated With Online Evaluations.
    Donnally CJ; Roth ES; Li DJ; Maguire JA; McCormick JR; Barker GP; Rivera S; Lebwohl NH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Dec; 43(24):1725-1730. PubMed ID: 29975328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study.
    Yan Q; Jensen KJ; Thomas R; Field AR; Jiang Z; Goei C; Davies MG
    JMIR Cardio; 2021 Feb; 5(1):e22975. PubMed ID: 33625359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.
    Gao GG; McCullough JS; Agarwal R; Jha AK
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):e38. PubMed ID: 22366336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Understanding Your Online Ratings: A Methodological Analysis Using Urogynecologists in the United States.
    Huber SA; Priestley J; Kasabwala K; Gadidov B; Culligan P
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 30807427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patient satisfaction reviews for 967 spine neurosurgeons on Healthgrades.
    Gupta A; Gupta R; White MD; Reddy V; Chang YF; Agarwal P; Alan N; Agarwal N
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 May; 36(5):869-875. PubMed ID: 34891133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physician-Rating Web Sites: Ethical Implications.
    Samora JB; Lifchez SD; Blazar PE;
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):104-10.e1. PubMed ID: 26304734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Social Media Use and Its Impact on Physician Review Website Ratings in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
    Tamura S; Bonoan M; Berenfeld D; Rubin J; Seref-Ferlengez Z; Kamara E
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Feb; 39(2):295-299. PubMed ID: 37852445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
    Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rejected Online Feedback From a Swiss Physician Rating Website Between 2008 and 2017: Analysis of 2352 Ratings.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e18374. PubMed ID: 32687479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.