131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34462866)
1. Association of hospital factors and socioeconomic status with the utilization of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer over a decade.
Patel R; Pant K; Patel KS; Merchant AM; Alvarez-Downing MM
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3750-3762. PubMed ID: 34462866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Disparities in the use of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease.
Robinson CN; Balentine CJ; Sansgiry S; Berger DH
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):897-903; discussion 903-4. PubMed ID: 22411487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors Associated With Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Emergency Settings.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens JM; Merchea A; Crandall M; Colibaseanu DT
J Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 243():75-82. PubMed ID: 31158727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting minimally invasive surgery utilization during elective colectomies for diverticular disease in the United States.
Bachelani AM; Holton LA
Surg Open Sci; 2024 Jun; 19():14-19. PubMed ID: 38585039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Disparities in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Florida.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens JM; Merchea A; Kasi PM; Crandall M; Colibaseanu DT
Am J Surg; 2019 Aug; 218(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 30503514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. With widespread adoption of MIS colectomy for colon cancer, does hospital type matter?
Freischlag K; Adam M; Turner M; Watson J; Ezekian B; Schroder PM; Mantyh C; Migaly J
Surg Endosc; 2019 Jan; 33(1):159-168. PubMed ID: 29946919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years.
Schneider MA; Gero D; Müller M; Horisberger K; Rickenbacher A; Turina M
Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6227-6243. PubMed ID: 33206242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new perspective on the value of minimally invasive colorectal surgery-payer, provider, and patient benefits.
Keller DS; Senagore AJ; Fitch K; Bochner A; Haas EM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2846-2853. PubMed ID: 27815745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National trends and disparities of minimally invasive surgery for localized renal cancer, 2010 to 2015.
Xia L; Talwar R; Taylor BL; Shin MH; Berger IB; Sperling CD; Chelluri RR; Zambrano IA; Raman JD; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):182.e17-182.e27. PubMed ID: 30630732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disparities in access to minimally invasive surgery for inflammatory bowel disease and outcomes by insurance status: analysis of the 2015 to 2019 National Inpatient Sample.
Lee Y; Andrew L; Hill S; An KR; Chatroux L; Anvari S; Hong D; Kuhnen AH
Surg Endosc; 2023 Dec; 37(12):9420-9426. PubMed ID: 37679584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emergent colectomy for colorectal cancer: A comparative analysis of open vs. minimally invasive approach.
Jecius H; Khurrum M; Krall E; Tso D; Pefok A; Silva R; Wusterbarth E; Arif H; Hamidi M; Nfonsam V
Am J Surg; 2023 Apr; 225(4):724-727. PubMed ID: 36307338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach.
Wei D; Johnston S; Goldstein L; Nagle D
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):610-621. PubMed ID: 31089882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated with Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: Evidence from 143 Illinois Hospitals, 2016 to 2018.
Traylor J; Simon M; Tsai S; Feinglass J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 32126301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer.
Alnasser M; Schneider EB; Gearhart SL; Wick EC; Fang SH; Haider AH; Efron JE
Surg Endosc; 2014 Jan; 28(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 24002916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally Invasive Surgery is Associated with Improved Outcomes Following Urgent Inpatient Colectomy.
Hajirawala LN; Krishnan V; Leonardi C; Bevier-Rawls ER; Orangio GR; Davis KG; Klinger AL; Barton JS
JSLS; 2022; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 35281708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period.
Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Chang EJ; Klar M; Matsushima K; Grubbs BH; Roman LD; Wright JD
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32473728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Disparate use of minimally invasive surgery in benign surgical conditions.
Ricciardi R; Selker HP; Baxter NN; Marcello PW; Roberts PL; Virnig BA
Surg Endosc; 2008 Sep; 22(9):1977-86. PubMed ID: 18594921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adoption of Robotic Technology for Treating Colorectal Cancer.
Schootman M; Hendren S; Ratnapradipa K; Stringer L; Davidson NO
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 27749475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
