These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34463143)

  • 1. Post-Market Surveillance Assessment of the Clinical Accuracy of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System with an Improved Algorithm for Enhanced Product Performance.
    Setford S; Liu Z; McColl D; Phillips S; Cameron H; Grady M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 17(1):133-140. PubMed ID: 34463143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seven-Year Clinical Surveillance Program Demonstrates Consistent MARD Accuracy Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip.
    Setford S; Grady M; Mackintosh S; Donald R; Levy B
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 29845873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post-Market Surveillance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Demonstrates No Evidence of Interference on Clinical Accuracy in a Large Cohort of People with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes.
    Phillips S; Setford S; Grady M; Liu Z; Cameron H
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 17(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 34486429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence From a Long-Term, Systematic Post-Market Surveillance Program: Clinical Performance of a Hematocrit-Insensitive Blood Glucose Test Strip.
    Setford S; Phillips S; Grady M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 15(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 30730221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seven-Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Product.
    Setford S; Grady M; Phillips S; Miller L; Mackintosh S; Cameron H; Corrigall K
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 28406040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of the C-CGM System.
    Rebec M; Cai K; Dutt-Ballerstadt R; Anderson E
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 16(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 33084416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measures of Accuracy for Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Blood Glucose Monitoring Devices.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Grady M; Setford S; Levy B
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 May; 13(3):575-583. PubMed ID: 30453761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Högel J; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.
    Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Hughes K; Tideman AM; Schachner HC; Stenger P; Pardo S; Dunne N; Parkes JL
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of a Unique Postmarket Surveillance Dataset That a Glucose Test-Strip Demonstrates no Evidence of Interference and Robust Clinical Accuracy Irrespective of the Prescription Medication Status of a Large Cohort of Patients With Diabetes.
    Grady M; Cameron H; Phillips S; Smith G; Setford S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 15(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 31478385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.
    Wadwa RP; Laffel LM; Shah VN; Garg SK
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 29901421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Clinical Trial of the Accuracy and Treatment Experience of the Flash Glucose Monitor FreeStyle Libre in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.
    Ólafsdóttir AF; Attvall S; Sandgren U; Dahlqvist S; Pivodic A; Skrtic S; Theodorsson E; Lind M
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Mar; 19(3):164-172. PubMed ID: 28263665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of factory-calibrated Freestyle Libre System with new glucose algorithm measurement accuracy and clinical performance in children with type 1 diabetes during summer camp.
    Szadkowska A; Michalak A; Łosiewicz A; Kuśmierczyk H; Krawczyk-Rusiecka K; Chrzanowski J; Gawrecki A; Zozulińska-Ziółkiewicz D; Fendler W
    Pediatr Diabetes; 2021 Mar; 22(2):261-270. PubMed ID: 33034075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of Cleared Blood Glucose Monitors.
    Klonoff DC; Prahalad P
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):895-910. PubMed ID: 25990294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mean Absolute Relative Difference of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems and Relationship to ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Mende J; Pleus S; Waldenmaier D; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Haug C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 Sep; 16(5):1089-1095. PubMed ID: 33759584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Quantitative Relationship Between ISO 15197 Accuracy Criteria and Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) in the Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Systems.
    Pardo S; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 10(5):1182-7. PubMed ID: 27118729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Pleus S; Link M; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Feb; 16(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 24205978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meeting the New FDA Standard for Accuracy of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test Systems Intended for Home Use by Lay Users.
    Katz LB; Stewart L; King D; Cameron H
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Sep; 14(5):912-916. PubMed ID: 32059615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Calibrated With Capillary Values Using Capillary or Venous Glucose Levels as a Reference.
    Andelin M; Kropff J; Matuleviciene V; Joseph JI; Attvall S; Theodorsson E; Hirsch IB; Imberg H; Dahlqvist S; Klonoff D; Haraldsson B; DeVries JH; Lind M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 26810924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects.
    Tack C; Pohlmeier H; Behnke T; Schmid V; Grenningloh M; Forst T; Pfützner A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Apr; 14(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 22176154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.