These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34463143)

  • 41. Flash Glucose Measurements in Children with Type 1 Diabetes in Real-Life Settings: To Trust or Not to Trust?
    Szadkowska A; Gawrecki A; Michalak A; Zozulińska-Ziółkiewicz D; Fendler W; Młynarski W
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jan; 20(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 29235898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comprehensive evaluation of the performance of the test strip technology for OneTouch Verio glucose meter systems.
    Bailey T; Chang A; Rosenblit PD; Jones L; Teft G; Setford S; Mahoney J
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Aug; 14(8):701-9. PubMed ID: 22853721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of five systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose in the hands of adult lay-users and professionals applying ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria and potential insulin dosing errors.
    Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Liebing C; Kamecke U; Haug C; Freckmann G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2019 Feb; 35(2):301-311. PubMed ID: 29927663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm.
    Bailey TS; Chang A; Christiansen M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 9(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 25370149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A Modified CGM Algorithm Enhances Data Availability While Retaining iCGM Performance.
    Harvey Towers RA; Zhang X; Yousefi R; Esmaili G; Wang L; Garcia A; Beck SE
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 Sep; 16(5):1224-1227. PubMed ID: 33855885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of time point of calibration on accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
    Zueger T; Diem P; Mougiakakou S; Stettler C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jul; 14(7):583-8. PubMed ID: 22512266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. REPLACE-BG: A Randomized Trial Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring With and Without Routine Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes.
    Aleppo G; Ruedy KJ; Riddlesworth TD; Kruger DF; Peters AL; Hirsch I; Bergenstal RM; Toschi E; Ahmann AJ; Shah VN; Rickels MR; Bode BW; Philis-Tsimikas A; Pop-Busui R; Rodriguez H; Eyth E; Bhargava A; Kollman C; Beck RW;
    Diabetes Care; 2017 Apr; 40(4):538-545. PubMed ID: 28209654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical Accuracy of a Glucose Oxidase-Based Blood Glucose Test-Strip Across Extremes of Oxygen Partial Pressure.
    Setford S; Phillips S; Cameron H; Grady M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2023 Mar; ():19322968231158663. PubMed ID: 36879470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Variation of Mean Absolute Relative Differences of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Throughout the Day.
    Pleus S; Stuhr A; Link M; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 May; 16(3):649-658. PubMed ID: 33615834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Investigation of the Accuracy of 18 Marketed Blood Glucose Monitors.
    Klonoff DC; Parkes JL; Kovatchev BP; Kerr D; Bevier WC; Brazg RL; Christiansen M; Bailey TS; Nichols JH; Kohn MA
    Diabetes Care; 2018 Aug; 41(8):1681-1688. PubMed ID: 29898901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accuracy, satisfaction and usability of a flash glucose monitoring system among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes attending a summer camp.
    Hansen EA; Klee P; Dirlewanger M; Bouthors T; Elowe-Gruau E; Stoppa-Vaucher S; Phan-Hug F; Antoniou MC; Pasquier J; Dwyer AA; Pitteloud N; Hauschild M
    Pediatr Diabetes; 2018 Nov; 19(7):1276-1284. PubMed ID: 30014625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accuracy and Safety of Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Diabetes.
    Garg SK; Kipnes M; Castorino K; Bailey TS; Akturk HK; Welsh JB; Christiansen MP; Balo AK; Brown SA; Reid JL; Beck SE
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2022 Jun; 24(6):373-380. PubMed ID: 35157505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Performance of the Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A secondary outcome analysis of a randomized crossover trial.
    Moser O; Eckstein ML; McCarthy O; Deere R; Pitt J; Williams DM; Hayes J; Sourij H; Bain SC; Bracken RM
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2019 Nov; 21(11):2505-2512. PubMed ID: 31332929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparative Accuracy Analysis of a Real-time and an Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
    Link M; Kamecke U; Waldenmaier D; Pleus S; Garcia A; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 15(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 31847555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Significance and Reliability of MARD for the Accuracy of CGM Systems.
    Reiterer F; Polterauer P; Schoemaker M; Schmelzeisen-Redecker G; Freckmann G; Heinemann L; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 11(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 27566735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring.
    Kovatchev BP; Patek SD; Ortiz EA; Breton MD
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 25436913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A new-generation continuous glucose monitoring system: improved accuracy and reliability compared with a previous-generation system.
    Christiansen M; Bailey T; Watkins E; Liljenquist D; Price D; Nakamura K; Boock R; Peyser T
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2013 Oct; 15(10):881-8. PubMed ID: 23777402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. FreeStyle Libre and Dexcom G4 Platinum sensors: Accuracy comparisons during two weeks of home use and use during experimentally induced glucose excursions.
    Boscari F; Galasso S; Facchinetti A; Marescotti MC; Vallone V; Amato AML; Avogaro A; Bruttomesso D
    Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2018 Feb; 28(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29258716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Benefits and Limitations of MARD as a Performance Parameter for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Interstitial Space.
    Heinemann L; Schoemaker M; Schmelzeisen-Redecker G; Hinzmann R; Kassab A; Freckmann G; Reiterer F; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 14(1):135-150. PubMed ID: 31216870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Development of the Diabetes Technology Society Blood Glucose Monitor System Surveillance Protocol.
    Klonoff DC; Lias C; Beck S; Parkes JL; Kovatchev B; Vigersky RA; Arreaza-Rubin G; Burk RD; Kowalski A; Little R; Nichols J; Petersen M; Rawlings K; Sacks DB; Sampson E; Scott S; Seley JJ; Slingerland R; Vesper HW
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 May; 10(3):697-707. PubMed ID: 26481642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.