134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34463361)
1. Cardiogenic shock and machine learning: A systematic review on prediction through clinical decision support softwares.
Aleman R; Patel S; Sleiman J; Navia J; Sheffield C; Brozzi NA
J Card Surg; 2021 Nov; 36(11):4153-4159. PubMed ID: 34463361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Bai Z; Hu S; Wang Y; Deng W; Gu N; Zhao R; Zhang W; Ma Y; Wang Z; Liu Z; Shen C; Shi B
Ann Transl Med; 2021 Jul; 9(14):1162. PubMed ID: 34430603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical picture, management and risk stratification in patients with cardiogenic shock: does gender matter?
Collado-Lledó E; Llaó I; Rivas-Lasarte M; González-Fernández V; Noriega FJ; Hernández-Perez FJ; Alegre O; Sionis A; Lidón RM; Viana-Tejedor A; Segovia-Cubero J; Ariza-Solé A
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Apr; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 32664921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial Intelligence in the Early Prediction of Cardiogenic Shock in Acute Heart Failure or Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Popat A; Yadav S; Patel SK; Baddevolu S; Adusumilli S; Rao Dasari N; Sundarasetty M; Anand S; Sankar J; Jagtap YG
Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50395. PubMed ID: 38213372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical Decision-Support Systems for Detection of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Sepsis, and Septic Shock in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review.
Wulff A; Montag S; Marschollek M; Jack T
Methods Inf Med; 2019 Dec; 58(S 02):e43-e57. PubMed ID: 31499571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early Prediction of Cardiogenic Shock Using Machine Learning.
Chang Y; Antonescu C; Ravindranath S; Dong J; Lu M; Vicario F; Wondrely L; Thompson P; Swearingen D; Acharya D
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():862424. PubMed ID: 35911549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review.
Medic G; Kosaner Kließ M; Atallah L; Weichert J; Panda S; Postma M; El-Kerdi A
F1000Res; 2019; 8():1728. PubMed ID: 31824670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Value of cardiac troponin T in predicting the prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock receiving veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment: a consecutive 5-year retrospective study].
Li W; Chen X; Mei Y; Lyu J; Hu D; Sun F; Zhang G; Zhang H; Zhang J
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2020 Sep; 32(9):1091-1095. PubMed ID: 33081896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.
Schumann J; Henrich EC; Strobl H; Prondzinsky R; Weiche S; Thiele H; Werdan K; Frantz S; Unverzagt S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD009669. PubMed ID: 29376560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How can we prevent and treat cardiogenic shock in patients who present to non-tertiary hospitals with myocardial infarction? A systematic review.
O'Connor E; Fraser JF
Med J Aust; 2009 Apr; 190(8):440-5. PubMed ID: 19374618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiogenic shock teams and centres: a contemporary review of multidisciplinary care for cardiogenic shock.
Moghaddam N; van Diepen S; So D; Lawler PR; Fordyce CB
ESC Heart Fail; 2021 Apr; 8(2):988-998. PubMed ID: 33452763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of cardiogenic shock hospital volume on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock.
Shaefi S; O'Gara B; Kociol RD; Joynt K; Mueller A; Nizamuddin J; Mahmood E; Talmor D; Shahul S
J Am Heart Assoc; 2015 Jan; 4(1):e001462. PubMed ID: 25559014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of risk prediction models in infarct-related cardiogenic shock.
Freund A; Pöss J; de Waha-Thiele S; Meyer-Saraei R; Fuernau G; Eitel I; Feistritzer HJ; Rubini M; Huber K; Windecker S; Montalescot G; Oldroyd K; Noc M; Zeymer U; Ouarrak T; Schneider S; Baran DA; Desch S; Thiele H
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2021 Oct; 10(8):890-897. PubMed ID: 34529043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive value of outcome scores in patients suffering from cardiogenic shock complicating AMI: APACHE II, APACHE III, Elebute-Stoner, SOFA, and SAPS II.
Kellner P; Prondzinsky R; Pallmann L; Siegmann S; Unverzagt S; Lemm H; Dietz S; Soukup J; Werdan K; Buerke M
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2013 Nov; 108(8):666-74. PubMed ID: 23558639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Temporary percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic literature review].
Negro A; Pecoraro V; Camerlingo MD; Maltoni S
G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2020 Feb; 21(2):128-137. PubMed ID: 32051636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Dynamics of interleukin 6 levels in the patients with cardiogenic and septic shock and in a control group of patients with uncomplicated AMI].
Pařenica J; Maláska J; Jarkovský J; Helánová K; Jabandžiev P; Michálek J; Veselková Z; Littnerová S; Kubková L; Gál R; Sevčík P; Goldbergová MP; Litzman J; Čermáková Z; Špinar J
Vnitr Lek; 2014 Feb; 60(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 24754415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Mortality Risk Models in Patients with Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock and Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support.
Chatzis G; Markus B; Syntila S; Waechter C; Luesebrink U; Ahrens H; Divchev D; Schieffer B; Karatolios K
J Interv Cardiol; 2021; 2021():8843935. PubMed ID: 33536855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A machine learning approach to predict early outcomes after pituitary adenoma surgery.
Hollon TC; Parikh A; Pandian B; Tarpeh J; Orringer DA; Barkan AL; McKean EL; Sullivan SE
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Nov; 45(5):E8. PubMed ID: 30453460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
