These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34463361)

  • 81. Circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3 and alteration in haemodynamics in cardiogenic shock: results from the OptimaCC trial.
    Takagi K; Blet A; Levy B; Deniau B; Azibani F; Feliot E; Bergmann A; Santos K; Hartmann O; Gayat E; Mebazaa A; Kimmoun A
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2020 Feb; 22(2):279-286. PubMed ID: 31472039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Infectious Complications and Immune/Inflammatory Response in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.
    Parenica J; Jarkovsky J; Malaska J; Mebazaa A; Gottwaldova J; Helanova K; Litzman J; Dastych M; Tomandl J; Spinar J; Dostalova L; Lokaj P; Tomandlova M; Pavkova MG; Sevcik P; Legrand M;
    Shock; 2017 Feb; 47(2):165-174. PubMed ID: 27749762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Acute Exacerbation of a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Prediction System Using Wearable Device Data, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning: Development and Cohort Study.
    Wu CT; Li GH; Huang CT; Cheng YC; Chen CH; Chien JY; Kuo PH; Kuo LC; Lai F
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 May; 9(5):e22591. PubMed ID: 33955840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Application of machine learning in predicting hospital readmissions: a scoping review of the literature.
    Huang Y; Talwar A; Chatterjee S; Aparasu RR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):96. PubMed ID: 33952192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Outcome differences in acute vs. acute on chronic heart failure and cardiogenic shock.
    Jones TL; Tan MC; Nguyen V; Kearney KE; Maynard CC; Anderson E; Mahr C; McCabe JM
    ESC Heart Fail; 2020 Jun; 7(3):1118-1124. PubMed ID: 32160418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of STEMI Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest.
    Omer MA; Tyler JM; Henry TD; Garberich R; Sharkey SW; Schmidt CW; Henry JT; Eckman P; Megaly M; Brilakis ES; Chavez I; Burke N; Gössl M; Mooney M; Sorajja P; Traverse JH; Wang Y; Hryniewicz K; Garcia S
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(10):1211-1219. PubMed ID: 32438992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Machine Learning for Early Lung Cancer Identification Using Routine Clinical and Laboratory Data.
    Gould MK; Huang BZ; Tammemagi MC; Kinar Y; Shiff R
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2021 Aug; 204(4):445-453. PubMed ID: 33823116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Machine Learning to Predict Mortality and Critical Events in a Cohort of Patients With COVID-19 in New York City: Model Development and Validation.
    Vaid A; Somani S; Russak AJ; De Freitas JK; Chaudhry FF; Paranjpe I; Johnson KW; Lee SJ; Miotto R; Richter F; Zhao S; Beckmann ND; Naik N; Kia A; Timsina P; Lala A; Paranjpe M; Golden E; Danieletto M; Singh M; Meyer D; O'Reilly PF; Huckins L; Kovatch P; Finkelstein J; Freeman RM; Argulian E; Kasarskis A; Percha B; Aberg JA; Bagiella E; Horowitz CR; Murphy B; Nestler EJ; Schadt EE; Cho JH; Cordon-Cardo C; Fuster V; Charney DS; Reich DL; Bottinger EP; Levin MA; Narula J; Fayad ZA; Just AC; Charney AW; Nadkarni GN; Glicksberg BS
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Nov; 22(11):e24018. PubMed ID: 33027032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Data processing pipeline for cardiogenic shock prediction using machine learning.
    Jajcay N; Bezak B; Segev A; Matetzky S; Jankova J; Spartalis M; El Tahlawi M; Guerra F; Friebel J; Thevathasan T; Berta I; Pölzl L; Nägele F; Pogran E; Cader FA; Jarakovic M; Gollmann-Tepeköylü C; Kollarova M; Petrikova K; Tica O; Krychtiuk KA; Tavazzi G; Skurk C; Huber K; Böhm A
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2023; 10():1132680. PubMed ID: 37034352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. The salivary metatranscriptome as an accurate diagnostic indicator of oral cancer.
    Banavar G; Ogundijo O; Toma R; Rajagopal S; Lim YK; Tang K; Camacho F; Torres PJ; Gline S; Parks M; Kenny L; Perlina A; Tily H; Dimitrova N; Amar S; Vuyisich M; Punyadeera C
    NPJ Genom Med; 2021 Dec; 6(1):105. PubMed ID: 34880265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Construction and evaluation of prognostic models of ECMO in elderly patients with cardiogenic shock based on BP neural network, random forest, and decision tree.
    Mo Z; Lu Z; Tang X; Lin X; Wang S; Zhang Y; Huang Z
    Am J Transl Res; 2023; 15(7):4639-4648. PubMed ID: 37560218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. The Multicenter Collaborative to Enhance Biologic Understanding, Quality, and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock (VANQUISH Shock): Rationale and Design.
    Tehrani BN; Drakos SG; Billia F; Batchelor WB; Luk A; Stelling K; Tonna J; Rosner C; Hanff T; Rao V; Brozzi NA; Baran DA
    Can J Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 38(8):1286-1295. PubMed ID: 35288292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Artificial Intelligence in the Early Prediction of Cardiogenic Shock in Acute Heart Failure or Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Popat A; Yadav S; Patel SK; Baddevolu S; Adusumilli S; Rao Dasari N; Sundarasetty M; Anand S; Sankar J; Jagtap YG
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50395. PubMed ID: 38213372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Clinical Decision-Support Systems for Detection of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Sepsis, and Septic Shock in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review.
    Wulff A; Montag S; Marschollek M; Jack T
    Methods Inf Med; 2019 Dec; 58(S 02):e43-e57. PubMed ID: 31499571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Cardiogenic shock and machine learning: A systematic review on prediction through clinical decision support softwares.
    Aleman R; Patel S; Sleiman J; Navia J; Sheffield C; Brozzi NA
    J Card Surg; 2021 Nov; 36(11):4153-4159. PubMed ID: 34463361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Bai Z; Hu S; Wang Y; Deng W; Gu N; Zhao R; Zhang W; Ma Y; Wang Z; Liu Z; Shen C; Shi B
    Ann Transl Med; 2021 Jul; 9(14):1162. PubMed ID: 34430603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Clinical picture, management and risk stratification in patients with cardiogenic shock: does gender matter?
    Collado-Lledó E; Llaó I; Rivas-Lasarte M; González-Fernández V; Noriega FJ; Hernández-Perez FJ; Alegre O; Sionis A; Lidón RM; Viana-Tejedor A; Segovia-Cubero J; Ariza-Solé A
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Apr; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 32664921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.