These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34464438)
1. Comparative assessment of relapse and failure between CAD/CAM stainless steel and standard stainless steel fixed retainers in orthodontic retention patients. Shim H; Foley P; Bankhead B; Kim KB Angle Orthod; 2022 Jan; 92(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 34464438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Tran G; Rucker R; Foley P; Bankhead B; Adel SM; Kim KB Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 38168815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of CAD/CAM-based fixed retainers versus conventional fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Bardideh E; Ghorbani M; Shafaee H; Saeedi P; Younessian F Eur J Orthod; 2023 Sep; 45(5):545-557. PubMed ID: 37471113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability, survival, and patient satisfaction with CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 6-month follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled clinical trial. Gera A; Pullisaar H; Cattaneo PM; Gera S; Vandevska-Radunovic V; Cornelis MA Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb; 45(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 35964235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of CAD/CAM Technology in Interventions Implemented in Orthodontics: A Scoping Review of Clinical Trials. Ardila CM; Elorza-Durán A; Arrubla-Escobar D Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():5310555. PubMed ID: 35692590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability, survival, patient satisfaction, and cost-minimization of CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 2-year follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled trial. Pullisaar H; Cattaneo PM; Gera A; Sankiewicz M; Bilińska M; Vandevska-Radunovic V; Cornelis MA Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; 46(2):. PubMed ID: 38394353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the effects of CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainers on teeth stability and periodontal health with conventional fixed and removable retainers: A randomized clinical trial. Alrawas MB; Kashoura Y; Tosun Ö; Öz U Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 May; 24(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 32865325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability and failure rate during 3 years of fixed retention: A follow-up of an randomized clinical trial on adolescents with four different lingual retainers. Çokakoğlu S; Adanur-Atmaca R; Çakır M; Öztürk F Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Apr; 27(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 37786933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Innovative customized CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer versus standard stainless-steel lingual retainer: A randomized controlled trial. Gelin E; Seidel L; Bruwier A; Albert A; Charavet C Korean J Orthod; 2020 Nov; 50(6):373-382. PubMed ID: 33144526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elemental composition, corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing fixed retainers versus conventional fixed retainers. Namura Y; Pullisaar H; Holm HV; Syverud M; Mulic A; Vandevska-Radunovic V J Oral Sci; 2024 Apr; 66(2):107-110. PubMed ID: 38403676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of different lingual retainers on periodontal health and stability. Adanur-Atmaca R; Çokakoğlu S; Öztürk F Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul; 91(4):468-476. PubMed ID: 33587126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical comparison between Multi-Stranded Wires and Single strand Ribbon wires used for lingual fixed retainers. Arash V; Teimoorian M; Farajzadeh Jalali Y; Sheikhzadeh S Prog Orthod; 2020 Jun; 21(1):22. PubMed ID: 32596755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. O'Rourke N; Albeedh H; Sharma P; Johal A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Sep; 150(3):406-15. PubMed ID: 27585768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers-an in vitro study. Roser C; Hilgenfeld T; Sen S; Badrow T; Zingler S; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Lux CJ; Juerchott A Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1423-1431. PubMed ID: 32785849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of Two Types of Fixed Lingual Retainers in Preventing Mandibular Incisor Relapse. Nagani NI; Ahmed I J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2020 Mar; 30(3):282-286. PubMed ID: 32169137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of periodontal effects and survival rates of Memotain and five-stranded bonded retainers : A prospective short-term study. Kartal Y; Kaya B; Polat-Özsoy Ö J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Jan; 82(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 32780168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Clinical comparison of bond failure rate between two types of mandibular canine-canine bonded orthodontic retainers- a randomized clinical trial". Nagani NI; Ahmed I; Tanveer F; Khursheed HM; Farooqui WA BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):180. PubMed ID: 32600325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo assessment of artefacts in MRI images caused by conventional twistflex and various fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers. Roser CJ; Hilgenfeld T; Saleem MA; Rückschloß T; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Lux CJ; Juerchott A J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Jul; 85(4):279-288. PubMed ID: 36700953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro comparison of the torsional load transfer of various commercially available stainless-steel wires used for fixed retainers in orthodontics. Engeler OG; Dalstra M; Arnold DT; Steineck M; Verna C J Orthod; 2021 Jun; 48(2):118-126. PubMed ID: 33231109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]