137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34464907)
1. Predicting the aggressiveness of peripheral zone prostate cancer using a fractional order calculus diffusion model.
Li Z; Dan G; Tammana V; Johnson S; Zhong Z; Rabiee B; Zhou XJ; L Xie K
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Oct; 143():109913. PubMed ID: 34464907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of mono-exponential, bi-exponential, kurtosis, and fractional-order calculus models of diffusion-weighted imaging in characterizing prostate lesions in transition zone.
Liu G; Lu Y; Dai Y; Xue K; Yi Y; Xu J; Wu D; Wu G
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jun; 46(6):2740-2750. PubMed ID: 33388809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a fractional-order calculus diffusion model and bi-parametric VI-RADS for staging and grading bladder urothelial carcinoma.
Feng C; Wang Y; Dan G; Zhong Z; Karaman MM; Li Z; Hu D; Zhou XJ
Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):890-900. PubMed ID: 34342693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population.
Ding K; Yao Y; Gao Y; Lu X; Chen H; Tang Q; Hua C; Zhou M; Zou X; Yin Q
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():138-146. PubMed ID: 31439233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of non-Gaussian diffusion imaging with a fractional order calculus model combined with conventional MRI for differentiating histological types of cervical cancer.
Zhang A; Hu Q; Song J; Dai Y; Wu D; Chen T
Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Nov; 93():181-188. PubMed ID: 35988835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values and ratios for the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness across different MRI acquisition settings.
Karaarslan E; Altan Kus A; Alis D; Karaarslan UC; Saglican Y; Argun OB; Kural AR
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2022 Jan; 28(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 35142611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Ratio Versus Conventional ADC for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With 3-T MRI.
Bajgiran AM; Mirak SA; Sung K; Sisk AE; Reiter RE; Raman SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):W134-W142. PubMed ID: 31216201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo assessment of Lauren classification for gastric adenocarcinoma using diffusion MRI with a fractional order calculus model.
Karaman MM; Tang L; Li Z; Sun Y; Li JZ; Zhou XJ
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5659-5668. PubMed ID: 33616764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Cindil E; Oner Y; Sendur HN; Ozdemir H; Gazel E; Tunc L; Cerit MN
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2019 Nov; 70(4):441-451. PubMed ID: 31561925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions in the Transition Zone by diffusion-weighted MRI.
Bao J; Wang X; Hu C; Hou J; Dong F; Guo L
Eur J Radiol Open; 2017; 4():123-128. PubMed ID: 29034282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
Wang X; Tu N; Qin T; Xing F; Wang P; Wu G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison study of monoexponential and fractional order calculus diffusion models and
Luo Y; Jiang H; Meng N; Huang Z; Li Z; Feng P; Fang T; Fu F; Yuan J; Wang Z; Yang Y; Wang M
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():907860. PubMed ID: 35936757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) in the Periferic Prostate Cancer Detection and Stratification.
Pesapane F; Patella F; Fumarola EM; Panella S; Ierardi AM; Pompili GG; Franceschelli G; Angileri SA; Magenta Biasina A; Carrafiello G
Med Oncol; 2017 Mar; 34(3):35. PubMed ID: 28144814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology.
Shan Y; Chen X; Liu K; Zeng M; Zhou J
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3441-3452. PubMed ID: 31144091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Luminal Water Imaging: Comparison With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) and PI-RADS for Characterization of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness.
Hectors SJ; Said D; Gnerre J; Tewari A; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jul; 52(1):271-279. PubMed ID: 31961049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The performance of intravoxel-incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging derived hypoxia for the risk stratification of prostate cancer in peripheral zone.
Chen Z; Xue Y; Zhang Z; Li W; Wen M; Zhao Y; Li J; Weng Z; Ye Q
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108865. PubMed ID: 32058895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stratification of the aggressiveness of prostate cancer using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI).
Dwivedi DK; Kumar R; Bora GS; Thulkar S; Sharma S; Gupta SD; Jagannathan NR
NMR Biomed; 2016 Mar; 29(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 26730884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer Using the Combination of Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Across Tumor Diffusion Volume and Clinical Information: A Pilot Study.
Zhang Z; Xu H; Xue Y; Li J; Ye Q
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):556-564. PubMed ID: 30173421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
