BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34466355)

  • 1. Bowel preparation with 1L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate NER1006 doubles the chance to detect three or more adenomas in overweight or obese males.
    Epstein M; Halonen J; Sharma P
    Endosc Int Open; 2021 Sep; 9(9):E1324-E1334. PubMed ID: 34466355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bowel-cleansing efficacy of the 1L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 (PLENVU) in patient subgroups in two phase III trials.
    Baile-Maxia S; Amlani B; Martínez RJ
    Therap Adv Gastroenterol; 2021; 14():17562848211020286. PubMed ID: 34249144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-quality colon cleansing and multiple neoplasia detection with 1L NER1006 versus mid-volume options: Post hoc analysis of phase 3 clinical trials.
    Epstein MS; Benamouzig R; Halonen J; Bisschops R
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 May; 8(5):E628-E635. PubMed ID: 32355881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 1L NER1006 can improve rates of adequate and high-quality bowel cleansing in the right colon: a post hoc analysis of two randomised clinical trials.
    Manning J; Halonen J; Cheriyamkunnel SJ; Álvarez-González MA
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):35. PubMed ID: 35078404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved high-quality colon cleansing with 1L NER1006 versus 2L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate or oral sulfate solution.
    Repici A; Coron E; Sharma P; Spada C; Di Leo M; Noble CL; Gschossmann J; Bargalló García A; Baumgart DC
    Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Dec; 51(12):1671-1677. PubMed ID: 31409579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bowel cleansing efficacy of 1 L NER1006
    Sinh P; Dunn K; John S
    JGH Open; 2022 Dec; 6(12):824-832. PubMed ID: 36514503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate.
    DeMicco MP; Clayton LB; Pilot J; Epstein MS;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):677-687.e3. PubMed ID: 28803744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial.
    Bisschops R; Manning J; Clayton LB; Ng Kwet Shing R; Álvarez-González M;
    Endoscopy; 2019 Jan; 51(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 30025414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized phase 3 trial.
    Schreiber S; Baumgart DC; Drenth JPH; Filip RS; Clayton LB; Hylands K; Repici A; Hassan C;
    Endoscopy; 2019 Jan; 51(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 30025415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness and safety of NER1006 versus standard bowel preparations: A meta-analysis of randomized phase-3 clinical trials.
    Maida M; Macaluso FS; Sferrazza S; Ventimiglia M; Sinagra E
    Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Aug; 52(8):833-839. PubMed ID: 32586765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation (NER1006): proof of concept assessment versus standard 2 L polyethylene glycol with ascorbate - a randomized, parallel group, phase 2, colonoscopist-blinded trial.
    Clayton LB; Tayo B; Halphen M; Kornberger R
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 May; 19(1):79. PubMed ID: 31146679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bowel cleansing effectiveness and safety of 1L PEG + Asc in the real-world setting: Observational, retrospective, multicenter study of over 13000 patients.
    López-Jamar JME; Gorjão R; Cotter J; Lorenzo-Zúñiga García V; Pantaleón Sánchez MA; Carral Martínez D; Sábado F; Pérez Arellano E; Gómez Rodríguez BJ; López Cano A; Machlab S; Arieira C; Akriche F; Turbí Disla C; Rodriguez Muñoz S
    Endosc Int Open; 2023 Aug; 11(8):E785-E793. PubMed ID: 37593156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution plus polyethylene glycol as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
    Rex DK; McGowan J; Cleveland Mv; Di Palma JA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 24830577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison Between an Oral Sulfate Solution and a 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol/Ascorbic Acid as a Split Dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.
    Lee HH; Lim CH; Kim JS; Cho YK; Lee BI; Cho YS; Lee IS; Choi MG
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2019; 53(10):e431-e437. PubMed ID: 30308546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study.
    Kwak MS; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Park DI; Kim KO; Lee J; Shin JE; Joo YE; Park J; Byeon JS; Kim HG
    Gut Liver; 2019 Mar; 13(2):176-182. PubMed ID: 30400725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized, controlled trial of 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate components versus sodium phosphate for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy for cancer screening.
    Ell C; Fischbach W; Layer P; Halphen M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2014 Dec; 30(12):2493-503. PubMed ID: 25180609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-analysis model of colonoscopy preparation using split-dose reduced-volume oral sulfate solution (OSS) and polyethylene glycol with electrolytes solution (PEG-ELS).
    Huynh L; Yermakov S; Davis M; Campbell R; Cleveland M; Farraye FA; Yenikomshian M
    J Med Econ; 2016; 19(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 26610148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of very low-volume preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective, multicenter observational study.
    Maida M; Sinagra E; Morreale GC; Sferrazza S; Scalisi G; Schillaci D; Ventimiglia M; Macaluso FS; Vettori G; Conoscenti G; Di Bartolo C; Garufi S; Catarella D; Manganaro M; Virgilio CM; Camilleri S
    World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 26(16):1950-1961. PubMed ID: 32390705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of the quality of bowel cleansing on the efficacy of colonic cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, blinded study.
    Pohl J; Halphen M; Kloess HR; Fischbach W
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126067. PubMed ID: 25950434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Two Intensive Bowel Cleansing Regimens in Patients With Previous Poor Bowel Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Study.
    Gimeno-García AZ; Hernandez G; Aldea A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Jiménez A; Carrillo M; Felipe V; Alarcón-Fernández O; Hernandez-Guerra M; Romero R; Alonso I; Gonzalez Y; Adrian Z; Moreno M; Ramos L; Quintero E
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jun; 112(6):951-958. PubMed ID: 28291237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.