275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34467426)
21. Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging for primary prostate cancer evaluation: Diagnostic potential of a non-contrast-enhanced bi-parametric approach enhanced with relaxometry measurements.
Arita Y; Akita H; Fujiwara H; Hashimoto M; Shigeta K; Kwee TC; Yoshida S; Kosaka T; Okuda S; Oya M; Jinzaki M
Eur J Radiol Open; 2022; 9():100403. PubMed ID: 35242886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Texture analysis based on PI-RADS 4/5-scored magnetic resonance images combined with machine learning to distinguish benign lesions from prostate cancer.
Ma L; Zhou Q; Yin H; Ang X; Li Y; Xie G; Li G
Transl Cancer Res; 2022 May; 11(5):1146-1161. PubMed ID: 35706813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinically insignificant prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance according to Prostate Cancer Research International: Active surveillance criteria: Utility of PI-RADS v2.
Yim JH; Kim CK; Kim JH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 28901655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Characterization: Combined Use of Radiomics Model with PI-RADS and Clinical Parameters.
Woźnicki P; Westhoff N; Huber T; Riffel P; Froelich MF; Gresser E; von Hardenberg J; Mühlberg A; Michel MS; Schoenberg SO; Nörenberg D
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 32630787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic value of integrated
Zeng Y; Leng X; Liao H; Jiang G; Chen P
Prostate Int; 2022 Jun; 10(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 35510079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The value of machine learning models based on biparametric MRI for diagnosis of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer].
Qiao XM; Hu CH; Hu S; Hu CH; Wang XM; Shen JK; Ji LB; Song Y; Bao J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 May; 103(19):1446-1454. PubMed ID: 37198106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Luminal Water Imaging: Comparison With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) and PI-RADS for Characterization of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness.
Hectors SJ; Said D; Gnerre J; Tewari A; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jul; 52(1):271-279. PubMed ID: 31961049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiomic features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between the transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary findings from a multi-institutional study.
Ginsburg SB; Algohary A; Pahwa S; Gulani V; Ponsky L; Aronen HJ; Boström PJ; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Brenner P; Delprado W; Thompson J; Pulbrock M; Taimen P; Villani R; Stricker P; Rastinehad AR; Jambor I; Madabhushi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):184-193. PubMed ID: 27990722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fully automated detection of prostate transition zone tumors on T2-weighted and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map MR images using U-Net ensemble.
Wong T; Schieda N; Sathiadoss P; Haroon M; Abreu-Gomez J; Ukwatta E
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6889-6900. PubMed ID: 34418108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict clinically significant prostate cancer of the peripheral zone with multiparametric MRI using clinical assessment categories and radiomic features.
Bernatz S; Ackermann J; Mandel P; Kaltenbach B; Zhdanovich Y; Harter PN; Döring C; Hammerstingl R; Bodelle B; Smith K; Bucher A; Albrecht M; Rosbach N; Basten L; Yel I; Wenzel M; Bankov K; Koch I; Chun FK; Köllermann J; Wild PJ; Vogl TJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6757-6769. PubMed ID: 32676784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Machine learning-based analysis of MR radiomics can help to improve the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 in clinically relevant prostate cancer.
Wang J; Wu CJ; Bao ML; Zhang J; Wang XN; Zhang YD
Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4082-4090. PubMed ID: 28374077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Assist PI-RADS Version 2 DWI Scoring? A Correlation Study Using the PI-RADSv2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Systems.
Gaur S; Harmon S; Rosenblum L; Greer MD; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):W33-W41. PubMed ID: 29733695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Machine learning-based radiomic models to predict intensity-modulated radiation therapy response, Gleason score and stage in prostate cancer.
Abdollahi H; Mofid B; Shiri I; Razzaghdoust A; Saadipoor A; Mahdavi A; Galandooz HM; Mahdavi SR
Radiol Med; 2019 Jun; 124(6):555-567. PubMed ID: 30607868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system
with the apparent diffusion coefficient map for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer].
Feng Z; Yan Z; Luo M; Liao Y; Rong P; Wang W
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Mar; 44(3):277-284. PubMed ID: 30971520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinico-radiological characteristic-based machine learning in reducing unnecessary prostate biopsies of PI-RADS 3 lesions with dual validation.
Kan Y; Zhang Q; Hao J; Wang W; Zhuang J; Gao J; Huang H; Liang J; Marra G; Calleris G; Oderda M; Zhao X; Gontero P; Guo H
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6274-6284. PubMed ID: 32524222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Machine and Deep Learning Prediction Of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Multiparametric MRI.
Bertelli E; Mercatelli L; Marzi C; Pachetti E; Baccini M; Barucci A; Colantonio S; Gherardini L; Lattavo L; Pascali MA; Agostini S; Miele V
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():802964. PubMed ID: 35096605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and MR volumetry as independent associative factors for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in prostatic carcinoma.
Lim C; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Shabana WM; Quon JS; El-Khodary M; Thornhill RE; El Hallani S; Schieda N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):726-36. PubMed ID: 26303719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A valuable MRI examination method for prostate cancer screening.
Yang X; Shan L; Cao H; Jiang X; Ma X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(48):e23134. PubMed ID: 33235074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
