These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34468438)

  • 1. Pain Relief After Selective Nerve Root Block as a Predictor of Postoperative Functional Outcome in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Undergoing Decompressive Surgery.
    Ko S; Jun C; Min WK; Son E; Lee S; Lee GW; Yoo H;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 May; 47(9):666-671. PubMed ID: 34468438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direction and Severity of Root Compression Affects the Clinical Outcome After Decompression?: Correlation Between Radiologic Grading and Postoperative Prognosis in Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis.
    Ko S; Lee H; Chae S; Choi W; Lee S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Oct; 33(8):E415-E419. PubMed ID: 32310831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usefulness of preoperative Short Form-36 Mental Component Score as a prognostic factor in patients who underwent decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ko S; Choi W
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Sep; 101(39):e30231. PubMed ID: 36181126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional Outcomes of Therapeutic Selective Nerve Root Block for Single-Segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.
    Xiao S; Zhu S; Guan B; Zhao J
    Med Sci Monit; 2024 Jun; 30():e943634. PubMed ID: 38905165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the effects of corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose solution on selective nerve root block for lumbar radiculopathy: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Ko S; Jun C; Lee JJ; Nam J
    Pain Pract; 2021 Sep; 21(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 33872462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Stienen MN; Maldaner N; Joswig H; Corniola MV; Bellut D; Prömmel P; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Schaller K; Gautschi OP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E4. PubMed ID: 31042663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of preoperative symptom duration on outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry study.
    Cushnie D; Thomas K; Jacobs WB; Cho RKH; Soroceanu A; Ahn H; Attabib N; Bailey CS; Fisher CG; Glennie RA; Hall H; Jarzem P; Johnson MG; Manson NA; Nataraj A; Paquet J; Rampersaud YR; Phan P; Casha S
    Spine J; 2019 Sep; 19(9):1470-1477. PubMed ID: 31121258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of the additional contrast agents to identify offending nerve root in selective nerve root block.
    Ko S; Nam J; Lee J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(5):e25131. PubMed ID: 35118998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive compared with open lumbar laminotomy: no functional benefits at 6 or 24 months after surgery.
    Ang CL; Phak-Boon Tow B; Fook S; Guo CM; Chen JL; Yue WM; Tan SB
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1705-12. PubMed ID: 24094717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Pain-reducing Effect After Selective Nerve Root Block According to the Type of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis.
    Ko S; Kwon J; Lee Y; Chae S; Choi W
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Mar; 32(2):E60-E64. PubMed ID: 30273185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short- and Long-Term Outcome of Microscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery in Patients with Predominant Back or Predominant Leg Pain.
    Stienen MN; Joswig H; Smoll NR; Corniola MV; Schaller K; Hildebrandt G; Gautschi OP
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 93():458-465.e1. PubMed ID: 27389938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Construct validity and responsiveness of commonly used patient reported outcome instruments in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Vishwanathan K; Braithwaite I
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2021 May; 16():125-131. PubMed ID: 33717946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
    Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.
    Park SM; Park J; Jang HS; Heo YW; Han H; Kim HJ; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2020 Feb; 20(2):156-165. PubMed ID: 31542473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.