209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34469470)
1. Testing silicone digit extensions as a way to suppress natural sensation to evaluate supplementary tactile feedback.
Engels LF; Cappello L; Fischer A; Cipriani C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256753. PubMed ID: 34469470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraneural sensory feedback restores grip force control and motor coordination while using a prosthetic hand.
Clemente F; Valle G; Controzzi M; Strauss I; Iberite F; Stieglitz T; Granata G; Rossini PM; Petrini F; Micera S; Cipriani C
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026034. PubMed ID: 30736030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous supplementary tactile feedback can be applied (and then removed) to enhance precision manipulation.
Cappello L; Alghilan W; Gabardi M; Leonardis D; Barsotti M; Frisoli A; Cipriani C
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 32859222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis.
Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Bentz T; Wüstefeld D; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):28. PubMed ID: 29580245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control.
Saunders I; Vijayakumar S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 8():60. PubMed ID: 22032545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tactile feedback is an effective instrument for the training of grasping with a prosthesis at low- and medium-force levels.
De Nunzio AM; Dosen S; Lemling S; Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Ge N; Graimann B; Falla D; Farina D
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Aug; 235(8):2547-2559. PubMed ID: 28550423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psycho-physiological assessment of a prosthetic hand sensory feedback system based on an auditory display: a preliminary study.
Gonzalez J; Soma H; Sekine M; Yu W
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 9():33. PubMed ID: 22682425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial tactile and proprioceptive feedback improves performance and confidence on object identification tasks.
Schiefer MA; Graczyk EL; Sidik SM; Tan DW; Tyler DJ
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0207659. PubMed ID: 30517154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multichannel Electrotactile Feedback With Spatial and Mixed Coding for Closed-Loop Control of Grasping Force in Hand Prostheses.
Dosen S; Markovic M; Strbac M; Belic M; Kojic V; Bijelic G; Keller T; Farina D
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Mar; 25(3):183-195. PubMed ID: 27071179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adding vibrotactile feedback to a myoelectric-controlled hand improves performance when online visual feedback is disturbed.
Raveh E; Portnoy S; Friedman J
Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Apr; 58():32-40. PubMed ID: 29353091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design and technical construction of a tactile display for sensory feedback in a hand prosthesis system.
Antfolk C; Balkenius C; Lundborg G; Rosén B; Sebelius F
Biomed Eng Online; 2010 Sep; 9():50. PubMed ID: 20840758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Myocontrol is closed-loop control: incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping.
Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(1):81. PubMed ID: 30176929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrotactile EMG feedback improves the control of prosthesis grasping force.
Schweisfurth MA; Markovic M; Dosen S; Teich F; Graimann B; Farina D
J Neural Eng; 2016 Oct; 13(5):056010. PubMed ID: 27547992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses.
Raspopovic S; Capogrosso M; Petrini FM; Bonizzato M; Rigosa J; Di Pino G; Carpaneto J; Controzzi M; Boretius T; Fernandez E; Granata G; Oddo CM; Citi L; Ciancio AL; Cipriani C; Carrozza MC; Jensen W; Guglielmelli E; Stieglitz T; Rossini PM; Micera S
Sci Transl Med; 2014 Feb; 6(222):222ra19. PubMed ID: 24500407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A soft neuroprosthetic hand providing simultaneous myoelectric control and tactile feedback.
Gu G; Zhang N; Xu H; Lin S; Yu Y; Chai G; Ge L; Yang H; Shao Q; Sheng X; Zhu X; Zhao X
Nat Biomed Eng; 2023 Apr; 7(4):589-598. PubMed ID: 34400808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neuromimetic Event-Based Detection for Closed-Loop Tactile Feedback Control of Upper Limb Prostheses.
Osborn L; Kaliki R; Soares A; Thakor N
IEEE Trans Haptics; 2016; 9(2):196-206. PubMed ID: 27777640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity to temporal parameters of intraneural tactile sensory feedback.
Valle G; Strauss I; D'Anna E; Granata G; Di Iorio R; Stieglitz T; Rossini PM; Raspopovic S; Petrini FM; Micera S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 17(1):110. PubMed ID: 32799900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Closed-Loop Control of a Multifunctional Myoelectric Prosthesis With Full-State Anatomically Congruent Electrotactile Feedback.
Garenfeld MA; Strbac M; Jorgovanovic N; Dideriksen JL; Dosen S
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():2090-2100. PubMed ID: 37058389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. GLIMPSE: Google Glass interface for sensory feedback in myoelectric hand prostheses.
Markovic M; Karnal H; Graimann B; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neural Eng; 2017 Jun; 14(3):036007. PubMed ID: 28355147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychometric characterization of incidental feedback sources during grasping with a hand prosthesis.
Wilke MA; Niethammer C; Meyer B; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 16(1):155. PubMed ID: 31823792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
