These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34469487)

  • 1. The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine.
    Schellinger J; Sewell K; Bloss JE; Ebron T; Forbes C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256833. PubMed ID: 34469487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews.
    Rethlefsen ML; Farrell AM; Osterhaus Trzasko LC; Brigham TJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):617-26. PubMed ID: 25766056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated with higher quality of reported search methods: a cross-sectional survey.
    Pawliuk C; Cheng S; Zheng A; Siden HH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 166():111237. PubMed ID: 38072177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the roles and challenges of librarians in dental systematic and scoping reviews.
    Schvaneveldt N; Stellrecht EM
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2021 Jan; 109(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 33424464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benchmarking veterinary librarians' participation in systematic reviews and scoping reviews.
    Toews L
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2019 Oct; 107(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 31607807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews.
    Meert D; Torabi N; Costella J
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Oct; 104(4):267-277. PubMed ID: 27822147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The case of the disappearing librarians: analyzing documentation of librarians' contributions to systematic reviews.
    Brunskill A; Hanneke R
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2022 Oct; 110(4):409-418. PubMed ID: 37101926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey.
    Grossetta Nardini HK; Batten J; Funaro MC; Garcia-Milian R; Nyhan K; Spak JM; Wang L; Glover JG
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2019; 4():23. PubMed ID: 31798974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services.
    McKeown S; Ross-White A
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2019 Jul; 107(3):411-419. PubMed ID: 31258447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Research Role of the Librarian at a Community Health Hackathon - A Technical Report.
    Shin N; Vela K; Evans K
    J Med Syst; 2019 Dec; 44(2):36. PubMed ID: 31853705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating clinical librarian services: a systematic review.
    Brettle A; Maden-Jenkins M; Anderson L; McNally R; Pratchett T; Tancock J; Thornton D; Webb A
    Health Info Libr J; 2011 Mar; 28(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 21314890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors.
    Koffel JB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125931. PubMed ID: 25938454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benchmarking participation of Canadian university health sciences librarians in systematic reviews.
    Murphy SA; Boden C
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Apr; 103(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 25918485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Koffel JB; Rethlefsen ML
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163309. PubMed ID: 27669416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks.
    Bullers K; Howard AM; Hanson A; Kearns WD; Orriola JJ; Polo RL; Sakmar KA
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2018 Apr; 106(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 29632442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining the Reach and Impact of a Systematic Review Service.
    Healy HS; Regan M; Deberg J
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2020; 39(2):125-138. PubMed ID: 32329673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of expert searching in the Family Physicians' Inquiries Network (FPIN).
    Ward D; Meadows SE; Nashelsky JE
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2005 Jan; 93(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 15685280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New activities and changing roles of health sciences librarians: a systematic review, 1990-2012.
    Cooper ID; Crum JA
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2013 Oct; 101(4):268-77. PubMed ID: 24163598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review.
    Spencer AJ; Eldredge JD
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2018 Jan; 106(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 29339933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Rethlefsen ML; Schroter S; Bouter LM; Moher D; Ayala AP; Kirkham JJ; Zeegers MP
    Trials; 2021 Nov; 22(1):791. PubMed ID: 34763714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.