159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34469674)
1. Clinical and radiographic outcomes following salvage intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Crivelli JJ; Johnson BA; Steinberg RL; Gahan JC; Antonelli JA; Morey AF; Pearle MS; Cadeddu JA
Int Braz J Urol; 2021; 47(6):1209-1218. PubMed ID: 34469674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Skeldon S; Dave S; Bagli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL; Farhat WA
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2571-5; discussion 2575. PubMed ID: 17945304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The management of secondary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction - a comparison of pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy.
Vannahme M; Mathur S; Davenport K; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
BJU Int; 2014 Jan; 113(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 24053370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Equivocal ureteropelvic junction obstruction on diuretic renogram--should minimally invasive pyeloplasty be offered to symptomatic patients?
Ozayar A; Friedlander JI; Shakir NA; Gahan JC; Cadeddu JA; Morgan MS
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1278-82. PubMed ID: 25444983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Advance in re-do pyeloplasty for the management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after surgery].
Xiong SW; Wang J; Zhu WJ; Cheng SD; Zhang L; Li XS; Zhou LQ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Aug; 52(4):794-798. PubMed ID: 32773819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.
Dimarco DS; Gettman MT; McGee SM; Chow GK; Leroy AJ; Slezak J; Patterson DE; Segura JW
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hydronephrosis: Comparison of extrinsic vessel versus intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction groups and a plea against the vascular hitch procedure.
Menon P; Rao KL; Sodhi KS; Bhattacharya A; Saxena AK; Mittal BR
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):80.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25794866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Matched comparison of primary versus salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Ambani SN; Yang DY; Wolf JS
World J Urol; 2017 Jun; 35(6):951-956. PubMed ID: 27722874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endopyelotomy for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our 25-year experience.
Kim EH; Tanagho YS; Traxel EJ; Austin PF; Figenshau RS; Coplen DE
J Urol; 2012 Oct; 188(4 Suppl):1628-33. PubMed ID: 22906656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of endopyelotomy in patients with secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Patel T; Kellner CP; Katsumi H; Gupta M
J Endourol; 2011 Apr; 25(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 21388243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after both failed open repair and endoscopic salvage.
Levin BM; Herrell SD
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):808-12. PubMed ID: 17094759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of etiology of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction on outcome of endopyelotomy.
Hoenig DM; Shalhav AL; Elbahnasy AM; McDougall EM; Smith D; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 1998 Apr; 12(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 9607438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children.
Davis TD; Burns AS; Corbett ST; Peters CA
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):394.e1-394.e7. PubMed ID: 27423387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade.
Yanke BV; Lallas CD; Pagnani C; McGinnis DE; Bagley DH
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1397-402. PubMed ID: 18707717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Our experience on management of failed pediatric pyeloplasty.
Ceyhan E; Dogan HS; Tekgul S
Pediatr Surg Int; 2020 Aug; 36(8):971-976. PubMed ID: 32542506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
