159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34469674)
21. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty.
Baldwin DD; Dunbar JA; Wells N; McDougall EM
J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12803987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty: a single surgical team experience with 38 cases.
Chiancone F; Fedelini M; Pucci L; Meccariello C; Fedelini P
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(3):512-517. PubMed ID: 28191792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Variation in the Use of Open Pyeloplasty, Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty, and Endopyelotomy for the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults.
Jacobs BL; Lai JC; Seelam R; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 27936909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults.
Khan F; Ahmed K; Lee N; Challacombe B; Khan MS; Dasgupta P
Nat Rev Urol; 2014 Nov; 11(11):629-38. PubMed ID: 25287785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of percutaneous endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Rukin NJ; Ashdown DA; Patel P; Liu S
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 Mar; 89(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 17346411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Antegrade endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Szydełko T; Kopeć R; Kasprzak J; Apoznański W; Kołodziej A; Zdrojowy R; Lorenz J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Feb; 19(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18976144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term outcome of secondary endopyelotomy after failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Park J; Kim WS; Hong B; Park T; Park HK
Int J Urol; 2008 Jun; 15(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 18422578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate.
Danuser H; Ackermann DK; Böhlen D; Studer UE
J Urol; 1998 Jan; 159(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 9400436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: outcomes for primary and secondary repairs, a single institution experience.
Thom MR; Haseebuddin M; Roytman TM; Benway BM; Bhayani SB; Figenshau RS
Int Braz J Urol; 2012; 38(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 22397782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of Acucise endopyelotomy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Biyani CS; Minhas S; el Cast J; Almond DJ; Cooksey G; Hetherington JW
Eur Urol; 2002 Mar; 41(3):305-10; discussion 310-1. PubMed ID: 12180233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.
Jacobs BL; Lai JC; Seelam R; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS;
Urology; 2018 Jan; 111():72-77. PubMed ID: 28943371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Varkarakis IM; Bhayani SB; Allaf ME; Inagaki T; Ong AM; Kavoussi LR; Jarrett TW
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):180-2. PubMed ID: 15201766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Analysis of Symptomatic Patients With Equivocal Renal Scans.
Fontenot PA; Capoccia TR; Wilson B; Arthur A; Duchene DA
Urology; 2016 Jul; 93():92-6. PubMed ID: 26972148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group.
Lucas SM; Sundaram CP; Wolf JS; Leveillee RJ; Bird VG; Aziz M; Pautler SE; Luke P; Erdeljan P; Baldwin DD; Ebrahimi K; Nadler RB; Rebuck D; Thomas R; Lee BR; Boylu U; Figenshau RS; Munver R; Averch TD; Gayed B; Shalhav AL; Gundeti MS; Castle EP; Anderson JK; Duffey BG; Landman J; Okhunov Z; Wong C; Strom KH
J Urol; 2012 Feb; 187(2):522-7. PubMed ID: 22177178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Practice trends in contemporary management of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Marcovich R; Jacobson AI; Aldana JP; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2003 Jul; 62(1):22-5; discussion 25-6. PubMed ID: 12837413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reoperative Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair in Children: Safety and Efficacy of the Technique.
Moscardi PR; Barbosa JA; Andrade HS; Mello MF; Cezarino BN; Oliveira LM; Srougi M; Dénes FT; Lopes RI
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):798-804. PubMed ID: 27789217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contemporary results of endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sim HG; Tan YH; Wong M
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2005 Mar; 34(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 15827665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Endopyelotomy versus redo pyeoloplasty for management of failed pyeloplasty in children: A single center experience.
Abdrabuh AM; Salih EM; Aboelnasr M; Galal H; El-Emam A; El-Zayat T
J Pediatr Surg; 2018 Nov; 53(11):2250-2255. PubMed ID: 29954589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Definitive Management of Failure After Pyeloplasty.
Swearingen R; Ambani S; Faerber GJ; Bloom DA; Wolf JS
J Endourol; 2016 May; 30 Suppl 1():S23-7. PubMed ID: 26976224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is routine postoperative diuresis renography indicated in all adult patients after pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction?
Lam W; Fernando A; Issa R; Heenan S; Sandhu S; Le Roux P; Anderson C
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):246-51. PubMed ID: 25530392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
