These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3446971)

  • 41. Differences in spectral composition between monostrut Bjork-Shiley and Carbomedics valves implanted in the aortic position.
    Sava HP; McDonnell JT
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1995 Sep; 33(5):689-94. PubMed ID: 8523911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Pericardial heterografts: why do these valves fail?
    Trowbridge EA; Lawford PV; Crofts CE; Roberts KM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Apr; 95(4):577-85. PubMed ID: 3352291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A preliminary durability study of two types of low-profile pericardial bioprosthetic valves through the use of accelerated fatigue testing and flow characterization.
    Schuster PR; Wagner JW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Feb; 23(2):207-22. PubMed ID: 2708409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Survival and bioprosthetic valve failure. Ten-year follow-up.
    Teoh KH; Ivanov J; Weisel RD; Darcel IC; Rakowski H
    Circulation; 1989 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):I8-15. PubMed ID: 2766540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Bioprosthesis degeneration in the aortic and mitral valve position. Results and problems from the cardiosurgical viewpoint].
    Antretter H; Cottogni M; Falbesoner C; Furtwängler W; Mair P; Falk M; Hutter J
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1993; 143(11):281-7. PubMed ID: 8212714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical and Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of bioprosthetic valve failure after 10 years.
    Teoh KH; Ivanov J; Weisel RD; Daniel LB; Darcel IC; Rakowski H
    Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV110-6. PubMed ID: 2225395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.
    Head SJ; Çelik M; Kappetein AP
    Eur Heart J; 2017 Jul; 38(28):2183-2191. PubMed ID: 28444168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Surgical pathology analysis of the causes of failure of 48 bioprosthetic heart valves in 40 Chinese cases].
    Duan XJ; Wang HY; Xu JP; Li L; Xu HY; Wang QZ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 54(9):710-5. PubMed ID: 27587216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The failure modes of biological prosthetic heart valves.
    Butany J; Leask R
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):115-35. PubMed ID: 11921659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Patterns of failure in Hancock pericardial bioprostheses.
    Walley VM; Rubens FD; Campagna M; Pipe AL; Keon WJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Aug; 102(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 1865694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve in the small aortic root. Results in 117 patients with 17 and 19 mm valves.
    Bojar RM; Diehl JT; Moten M; Payne DD; Rastegar H; Stetz JJ; Pandian NG; Cleveland RJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Dec; 98(6):1087-95. PubMed ID: 2586125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Noncalcific cusp thickening in Ionescu-Shiley cardiac valvular bioprostheses.
    Walley VM; Wolfsohn AL; Ghadially FN; Silver MM
    Mod Pathol; 1995 Feb; 8(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 7777471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A noninvasive method to evaluate the ageing of bioprosthetic valves in the clinical setting.
    Longhini C; Baracca E; Aggio S; Brunazzi C; Gallucci V; Pansini R
    Acta Cardiol; 1991; 46(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 2031414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Spectral analysis of the first heart sound in patients with biological mitral valve prosthesis. Preliminary results.
    Longhini C; Baracca E; Aggio S; Brunazzi C; Gallucci V; Pansini R
    Acta Cardiol; 1990; 45(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 2368544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Unusual 25-year durability of an Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis.
    Fiore A; Cooley DA; Grande AM; Viganò M; Angelini P
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Apr; 91(4):e52-3. PubMed ID: 21440107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Platelet adherence to bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
    Magilligan DJ; Oyama C; Klein S; Riddle JM; Smith D
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Mar; 53(7):945-9. PubMed ID: 6422734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of experience with the Hancock and Ionescu-Shiley low-profile pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reece IJ; Fisher J; Sethia B; MacArthur KJ; Wheatley DJ
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():232-6. PubMed ID: 3727691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fundamental basis and clinical validation of frequency analysis of the valve closure sound as an indicator of stiffening of bioprosthetic valves.
    Stein PD; Sabbah HN; Lakier JB; Kemp SR; Magilligan DJ
    J Cardiogr Suppl; 1984 Oct; (5):57-8. PubMed ID: 6512281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Ionescu-Shiley valve: a solution for the small aortic root.
    Revuelta JM; Garcia-Rinaldi R; Johnston RH; Bonnington L; Ubago JL; Duran CG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Aug; 88(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 6748717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.