These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3447006)

  • 41. Twisted trees and inconsistency of tree estimation when gaps are treated as missing data - The impact of model mis-specification in distance corrections.
    McTavish EJ; Steel M; Holder MT
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Dec; 93():289-95. PubMed ID: 26256643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Identifiability of the unrooted species tree topology under the coalescent model with time-reversible substitution processes, site-specific rate variation, and invariable sites.
    Chifman J; Kubatko L
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Jun; 374():35-47. PubMed ID: 25791286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The problem of rooting rapid radiations.
    Shavit L; Penny D; Hendy MD; Holland BR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Nov; 24(11):2400-11. PubMed ID: 17720690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A method for molecular phylogeny construction by direct use of nucleotide sequence data.
    Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1990 Jan; 30(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 2107326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.
    Huang H; He Q; Kubatko LS; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 20833951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Tree and rate estimation by local evaluation of heterochronous nucleotide data.
    Yang Z; O'Brien JD; Zheng X; Zhu HQ; She ZS
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 17110369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Maximum parsimony, substitution model, and probability phylogenetic trees.
    Weng JF; Thomas DA; Mareels I
    J Comput Biol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 20624099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On the inference of large phylogenies with long branches: how long is too long?
    Mossel E; Roch S; Sly A
    Bull Math Biol; 2011 Jul; 73(7):1627-44. PubMed ID: 20931293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A strict upper bound for the partition distance and the cluster distance of phylogenetic trees for each fixed pair of topological trees.
    Middendorf M; Wieseke N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204907. PubMed ID: 30265723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On cherry and pitchfork distributions of random rooted and unrooted phylogenetic trees.
    Choi KP; Thompson A; Wu T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2020 Apr; 132():92-104. PubMed ID: 32135170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Relationships between gene trees and species trees.
    Pamilo P; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 Sep; 5(5):568-83. PubMed ID: 3193878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A computer simulation analysis of the accuracy of partial genome sequencing and restriction fragment analysis in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships.
    Qiao B; Goldberg TL; Olsen GJ; Weigel RM
    Infect Genet Evol; 2006 Jul; 6(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 16406823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A discrete Fourier analysis for evolutionary trees.
    Hendy MD; Penny D; Steel MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1994 Apr; 91(8):3339-43. PubMed ID: 8159749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Bayesian, maximum parsimony and UPGMA models for inferring the phylogenies of antelopes using mitochondrial markers.
    Khan HA; Arif IA; Bahkali AH; Al Farhan AH; Al Homaidan AA
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2008 Oct; 4():263-70. PubMed ID: 19204824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. When does the incongruence length difference test fail?
    Darlu P; Lecointre G
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 11919284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Disk-covering, a fast-converging method for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
    Huson DH; Nettles SM; Warnow TJ
    J Comput Biol; 1999; 6(3-4):369-86. PubMed ID: 10582573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. ACCURACY OF ESTIMATED PHYLOGENIES: EFFECTS OF TREE TOPOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY MODEL.
    Rohlf FJ; Chang WS; Sokal RR; Kim J
    Evolution; 1990 Sep; 44(6):1671-1684. PubMed ID: 28564306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.