These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34470073)

  • 21. Diagnostic film dosimeter in the study of radiation exposure to the population resulting from x-ray fluoroscopy.
    Bojtor I; Bogdany B; Koczkas G
    Br J Radiol; 1968 Feb; 41(482):147-9. PubMed ID: 5635908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acceptance testing of fluoroscopy systems used for interventional purposes.
    O'Connor U; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; Walsh C; Larkin A; Gray L; Devine M; Malone J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):56-8. PubMed ID: 18285319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The new Joint Commission sentinel event pertaining to prolonged fluoroscopy.
    Balter S; Miller DL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jul; 4(7):497-500. PubMed ID: 17601594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations should require that all physicians who perform fluoroscopy be credentialed in radiation management by their healthcare facility.
    Archer BR; Gooden DS
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10659731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The quality assurance and constancy checking of fluoroscopy and fluorography systems.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):49-52. PubMed ID: 11487842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of surgeon versus technologist control of fluoroscopy on radiation exposure during pediatric ureteroscopy: A randomized trial.
    Kokorowski PJ; Chow JS; Cilento BG; Kim DS; Kurtz MP; Logvinenko T; MacDougall RD; Nelson CP
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Aug; 14(4):334.e1-334.e8. PubMed ID: 30257794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnosis and treatment: useful preliminaries to contrast x-ray examinations in children. With comments on technique.
    Pediatrics; 1967 Jan; 39(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 6016223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interventional fluoroscopy: reducing radiation risks for patients and staff.
    Miller DL;
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Jul; 20(7 Suppl):S274. PubMed ID: 19560007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital radiography of the chest in pediatrics.
    Chateil JF; Durand C; Brun M; Baudain P; Diard F
    Pediatr Pulmonol Suppl; 1997; 16():54-5. PubMed ID: 9443197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cardiac catheterization in the pediatric patient.
    Gersony WM; Bierman FZ
    Pediatrics; 1981 May; 67(5):738-40. PubMed ID: 7255008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Minimizing radiation injury and neoplastic effects during pediatric fluoroscopy: what should we know?
    Wagner LK
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):141-5. PubMed ID: 16862420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Interpretation and indications of myelogram in clinical pediatrics].
    AGUIRRE A
    Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex; 1952 Aug; 9(4):427-46. PubMed ID: 12987412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients--a white paper executive summary.
    Strauss KJ; Kaste SC
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):110-2. PubMed ID: 16862422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems.
    Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Functional and comparative study of direct view image intensifier systems.
    Blanchard LR; Manchester JS
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1967 Sep; 18(3):393-5. PubMed ID: 6058489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of coronary artery computed tomography versus fluoroscopy for the assessment of coronary artery disease prognosis.
    Taylor AJ; O'Malley PG; Detrano RC
    Am J Cardiol; 2001 Sep; 88(6):675-7. PubMed ID: 11564395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A multihospital survey of radiation exposure and image quality in pediatric fluoroscopy.
    Brown PH; Silberberg PJ; Thomas RD; Strife JL; Towbin RB
    Pediatr Radiol; 2000 Apr; 30(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 10789901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Reasons for poor-grade fluorograms].
    Sagatelian EA
    Probl Tuberk; 1988; (1):65-7. PubMed ID: 2966395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Experience with quality control in fluoroscopic installations].
    Schmidt T; Zeitler E
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1985; 123():156-62. PubMed ID: 2860858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Current practice in paediatric videofluoroscopy.
    Hiorns MP; Ryan MM
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36(9):911-9. PubMed ID: 16552584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.