These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34470293)

  • 1. Individual differences in speech intelligibility at a cocktail party: A modeling perspective.
    Lavandier M; Mason CR; Baltzell LS; Best V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):1076. PubMed ID: 34470293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A binaural model implementing an internal noise to predict the effect of hearing impairment on speech intelligibility in non-stationary noises.
    Vicente T; Lavandier M; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):3305. PubMed ID: 33261412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a clinically viable spectro-temporal modulation test for predicting supra-threshold speech reception in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Zaar J; Simonsen LB; Dau T; Laugesen S
    Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 427():108650. PubMed ID: 36463632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting speech intelligibility in hearing-impaired listeners using a physiologically inspired auditory model.
    Zaar J; Carney LH
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108553. PubMed ID: 35750575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Listening through hearing aids affects spatial perception and speech intelligibility in normal-hearing listeners.
    Cubick J; Buchholz JM; Best V; Lavandier M; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2896. PubMed ID: 30522291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling Sluggishness in Binaural Unmasking of Speech for Maskers With Time-Varying Interaural Phase Differences.
    Hauth CF; Brand T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216517753547. PubMed ID: 29338577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of audibility on better-ear glimpsing as a function of frequency in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2195. PubMed ID: 29716302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modelling the speech reception threshold in non-stationary noise in hearing-impaired listeners as a function of level.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):856-65. PubMed ID: 20936997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level.
    Rhebergen KS; Pool RE; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling binaural unmasking and the intelligibility of speech in noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Vicente T; Buchholz JM; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3275. PubMed ID: 34852607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners.
    George EL; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Goverts ST; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2362-75. PubMed ID: 17471748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intelligibility in speech maskers with a binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Gorospe JM; Ruiz SSC; Benito F; Wilson BS
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():134-137. PubMed ID: 28188882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.