170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34471170)
21. Benefit of Improved Performance with State-of-the Art Digital PET/CT for Lesion Detection in Oncology.
Surti S; Viswanath V; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Conti M; Casey ME; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2020 Nov; 61(11):1684-1690. PubMed ID: 32198313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability.
Morey AM; Kadrmas DJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 24221921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Benefits of point-spread function and time of flight for PET/CT image quality in relation to the body mass index and injected dose.
Akamatsu G; Mitsumoto K; Ishikawa K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Jun; 38(6):407-12. PubMed ID: 23603585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical
Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. PET optimization for improved assessment and accurate quantification of 90Y-microsphere biodistribution after radioembolization.
Martí-Climent JM; Prieto E; Elosúa C; Rodríguez-Fraile M; Domínguez-Prado I; Vigil C; García-Velloso MJ; Arbizu J; Peñuelas I; Richter JA
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):092503. PubMed ID: 25186412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance characteristics of silicon photomultiplier based 15-cm AFOV TOF PET/CT.
Vandendriessche D; Uribe J; Bertin H; De Geeter F
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 May; 6(1):8. PubMed ID: 31076884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Organ-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Scanners for Breast Imaging: Comparison between the Performances of Prior and Novel Models.
Satoh Y; Hanaoka K; Ikegawa C; Imai M; Watanabe S; Morimoto-Ishikawa D; Onishi H; Ito T; Komoike Y; Ishii K
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimisation of scan duration and image quality in oncological
van Sluis J; Boellaard R; Dierckx RAJO; van Esch ELM; Croes DA; de Ruijter LK; van de Donk PP; de Vries EGE; Noordzij W; Brouwers AH
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jul; 50(8):2258-2270. PubMed ID: 36947185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm.
Vennart NJ; Bird N; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Nowosinska E; Heard S
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):471-479. PubMed ID: 28394818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Harmonizing SUVs in multicentre trials when using different generation PET systems: prospective validation in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Lasnon C; Desmonts C; Quak E; Gervais R; Do P; Dubos-Arvis C; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jul; 40(7):985-96. PubMed ID: 23564036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Studies of a Next-Generation Silicon-Photomultiplier-Based Time-of-Flight PET/CT System.
Hsu DFC; Ilan E; Peterson WT; Uribe J; Lubberink M; Levin CS
J Nucl Med; 2017 Sep; 58(9):1511-1518. PubMed ID: 28450566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction of
Lindström E; Lindsjö L; Sundin A; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jun; 7(1):40. PubMed ID: 32542512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative and Visual Assessments toward Potential Sub-mSv or Ultrafast FDG PET Using High-Sensitivity TOF PET in PET/MRI.
Behr SC; Bahroos E; Hawkins RA; Nardo L; Ravanfar V; Capbarat EV; Seo Y
Mol Imaging Biol; 2018 Jun; 20(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29192363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Phantom and clinical assessment of small pulmonary nodules using Q.Clear reconstruction on a silicon-photomultiplier-based time-of-flight PET/CT system.
Wu Z; Guo B; Huang B; Hao X; Wu P; Zhao B; Qin Z; Xie J; Li S
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10328. PubMed ID: 33990659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Direct comparison of brain [
Wagatsuma K; Sakata M; Ishibashi K; Hirayama A; Kawakami H; Miwa K; Suzuki Y; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Nov; 7(1):70. PubMed ID: 33226451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Applications of both time of flight and point spread function in brain PET image reconstruction.
Shao X; Shao X; Wang X; Wang Y
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Apr; 37(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 26637071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reducing Radiation Exposure to Paediatric Patients Undergoing [18F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging.
Kertész H; Beyer T; London K; Saleh H; Chung D; Rausch I; Cal-Gonzalez J; Kitsos T; Kench PL
Mol Imaging Biol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):775-786. PubMed ID: 33846898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Technical Note: Performance evaluation of a small-animal PET/CT system based on NEMA NU 4-2008 standards.
Liu Q; Li C; Liu J; Krish K; Fu X; Zhao J; Chen JC
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5272-5282. PubMed ID: 34252215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
