160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34471475)
1. Clinical Evaluation of Buccal Fat Pad and Nasolabial Flap for Oral Submucous Fibrosis Intraoral Defects.
Anehosur V; Singh PK; Dikhit PS; Vadera H
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2021 Sep; 14(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 34471475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Retrospective Study Comparing the Surgical Results of Platysma Myocutaneous Flap, Buccal Pad of Fat, and Nasolabial Flap for Reconstruction After Fibrotomy in Cases of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.
Tulsidas Singh W; Bhola N; Singh DN; Agarwal A; Aparna Devi P; Aheibam KK
Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60297. PubMed ID: 38872644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is buccal fat pad a better option than nasolabial flap for reconstruction of intraoral defects after surgical release of fibrous bands in patients with oral submucous fibrosis? A pilot study: a protocol for the management of oral submucous fibrosis.
Rai A; Datarkar A; Rai M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e111-6. PubMed ID: 24103462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of nasolabial flap in reconstruction of fibrotomy defect in surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: a prospective study.
Lambade P; Meshram V; Thorat P; Dawane P; Thorat A; Rajkhokar D
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 20(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 26289230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of the Buccal Fat Pad and Extended Nasolabial Flap in the Reconstruction of the Surgical Defect in Oral Submucous Fibrosis Patients.
Agrawal D; Pathak R; Newaskar V; Idrees F; Waskle R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 76(3):676.e1-676.e5. PubMed ID: 29223311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of nasolabial flap and buccal fat pad flap in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al-Madhoon HW; Elkhateb A; Asla MM; Jaber M
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Mar; 28(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 37219705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Versatility of nasolabial flaps for the management of severe trismus in oral submucous fibrosis.
Balaji SM
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(5):492-497. PubMed ID: 27966506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional outcome of two different grafting techniques in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: a comparative evaluation.
Dasukil S; Jena AK; Boyina KK; Grover S; Arora G; Ahmed ZU
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 26(3):477-483. PubMed ID: 34661770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Evaluation of Nasolabial Flap, Buccal Fat Pad and Platysma Myocutaneous Flap for Reconstruction of Oral Sub Mucous Fibrosis Defects.
Singh AK; Bera RN; Neville JF; Tripathi R; Sharma NK; Kumar JA; Hirani MS; Chauhan N
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Dec; 75(4):2945-2951. PubMed ID: 37974718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis using buccal fat pad: a retrospective study of 30 cases.
Thukral H; Roy Chowdhury SK; Nagori SA
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 22(4):403-408. PubMed ID: 30238329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical defect coverage in oral submucous fibrosis patients with single-stage extended nasolabial flap.
Idrees F; Patel P; Newaskar V; Agrawal D
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 20(4):411-415. PubMed ID: 27663242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extended nasolabial flap compared with the platysma myocutaneous muscle flap for reconstruction of intraoral defects after release of oral submucous fibrosis: a comparative study.
Bande CR; Datarkar A; Khare N
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 51(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 22554695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral inferiorly based nasolabial flaps for the management of advanced oral submucous fibrosis.
Kshirsagar R; Chugh Modi A; Rai A
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2010 Mar; 9(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 23139561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparative Evaluation between the Use of Buccal Pad of Fat and Bovine Collagen Membrane in the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.
Kothari S; Mittal S; Shaik I; Gufran K; Daharwal R; Kolli H
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S190-S193. PubMed ID: 34447073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis with "Seagull-nasolabial flap" combined with short-term oral pentoxifylline for preventing relapse.
Kholakiya Y; Jose A; Rawat A; Nagori SA; Jacob S; Roychoudhury A
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 121(5):512-516. PubMed ID: 31904528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Versatility of Buccal Pad Fat and Temporoparietal Fascia Flap in Surgical Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.
Mukherjee S; Dandagi S
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2019; 9(2):444-450. PubMed ID: 31909033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of Oral Sub Mucous Fibrosis Using Three Different Flaps: Superficial Temporal, Nasolabial Flap, Buccal Fat Pad Flap Along with Active Physiotherapy- A Comparative Study.
Koul D; Arora S; Sangle A; Desai T; Inamdar ZAF
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Sep; 75(3):1376-1385. PubMed ID: 37636608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of buccal fat pad for treatment of oral submucous fibrosis.
Sharma R; Thapliyal GK; Sinha R; Menon PS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):228-32. PubMed ID: 21549481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative Evaluation of Reconstructive Methods in Oral Submucous Fibrosis.
Sikkerimath BC; Dandagi S; Anshu A; Jose A
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2021 Dec; 20(4):597-606. PubMed ID: 34776692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is the Optimal Reconstructive Option for Oral Submucous Fibrosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Buccal Pad of Fat Versus Conventional Nasolabial and Extended Nasolabial Flap Versus Platysma Myocutaneous Flap.
Tiwari P; Bera RN; Chauhan N
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2020 Dec; 19(4):490-497. PubMed ID: 33071494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
