229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34472915)
1. Age differences in intuitive moral decision-making: Associations with inter-network neural connectivity.
Huang S; Faul L; Sevinc G; Mwilambwe-Tshilobo L; Setton R; Lockrow AW; Ebner NC; Turner GR; Spreng RN; De Brigard F
Psychol Aging; 2021 Dec; 36(8):902-916. PubMed ID: 34472915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment.
Kahane G; Wiech K; Shackel N; Farias M; Savulescu J; Tracey I
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 7(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 21421730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age-related differences in Default Mode Network resting-state functional connectivity but not gray matter volume relate to sacrificial moral decision-making and working memory performance.
Daley RT; Kensinger EA
Neuropsychologia; 2022 Dec; 177():108399. PubMed ID: 36332697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Awareness to utilitarian responses in later life: An ERP study with moral dilemmas.
Fernandes C; Pasion R; Gonçalves AR; Almeida R; Garcez H; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
Neurosci Lett; 2022 Sep; 787():136824. PubMed ID: 35917838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.
Kahane G
Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 25791902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hippocampal Damage Increases Deontological Responses during Moral Decision Making.
McCormick C; Rosenthal CR; Miller TD; Maguire EA
J Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 36(48):12157-12167. PubMed ID: 27903725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Counter-intuitive moral judgement following traumatic brain injury.
Rowley DA; Rogish M; Alexander T; Riggs KJ
J Neuropsychol; 2018 Jun; 12(2):200-215. PubMed ID: 28168820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Moral Judgment and Empathic/Deontological Guilt.
Migliore S; D'Aurizio G; Parisi F; Maffi S; Squitieri B; Curcio G; Mancini F
Psychol Rep; 2019 Aug; 122(4):1395-1411. PubMed ID: 30025498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive decline, socioemotional change, or both? How the science of aging can inform future research on sacrificial moral dilemmas.
Daley RT; Kensinger EA
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2023 Mar; 30(2):272-299. PubMed ID: 34933658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
Conway P; Gawronski B
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):216-35. PubMed ID: 23276267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are 'counter-intuitive' deontological judgments really counter-intuitive? An empirical reply to.
Paxton JM; Bruni T; Greene JD
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 9(9):1368-71. PubMed ID: 23887818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intuition and Moral Decision-Making - The Effect of Time Pressure and Cognitive Load on Moral Judgment and Altruistic Behavior.
Tinghög G; Andersson D; Bonn C; Johannesson M; Kirchler M; Koppel L; Västfjäll D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164012. PubMed ID: 27783704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional alteration in frontolimbic systems relevant to moral judgment in cocaine-dependent subjects.
Verdejo-Garcia A; Contreras-Rodríguez O; Fonseca F; Cuenca A; Soriano-Mas C; Rodriguez J; Pardo-Lozano R; Blanco-Hinojo L; de Sola Llopis S; Farré M; Torrens M; Pujol J; de la Torre R
Addict Biol; 2014 Mar; 19(2):272-81. PubMed ID: 22784032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Making utilitarian choices but giving deontological advice.
Polman E; Ruttan RL
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Oct; 151(10):2614-2621. PubMed ID: 35191727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The intuitive greater good: Testing the corrective dual process model of moral cognition.
Bago B; De Neys W
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1782-1801. PubMed ID: 30550336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making.
Bartels DM
Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):381-417. PubMed ID: 18486121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Emotional and Utilitarian Appraisals of Moral Dilemmas Are Encoded in Separate Areas and Integrated in Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex.
Hutcherson CA; Montaser-Kouhsari L; Woodward J; Rangel A
J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(36):12593-605. PubMed ID: 26354924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. (How) Do You Regret Killing One to Save Five? Affective and Cognitive Regret Differ After Utilitarian and Deontological Decisions.
Goldstein-Greenwood J; Conway P; Summerville A; Johnson BN
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1303-1317. PubMed ID: 31989859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testosterone administration in females modulates moral judgment and patterns of brain activation and functional connectivity.
Chen C; Decety J; Huang PC; Chen CY; Cheng Y
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3417-30. PubMed ID: 27145084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
