These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34472947)
1. A computational model of infant learning and reasoning with probabilities. Shultz TR; Nobandegani AS Psychol Rev; 2022 Nov; 129(6):1281-1295. PubMed ID: 34472947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A theory of learning to infer. Dasgupta I; Schulz E; Tenenbaum JB; Gershman SJ Psychol Rev; 2020 Apr; 127(3):412-441. PubMed ID: 32223286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments. Zhu JQ; Sanborn AN; Chater N Psychol Rev; 2020 Oct; 127(5):719-748. PubMed ID: 32191073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Explaining the implicit negations effect in conditional inference: Experience, probabilities, and contrast sets. Vance J; Oaksford M J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):354-384. PubMed ID: 32881565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Probabilistic inference in human infants. Denison S; Xu F Adv Child Dev Behav; 2012; 43():27-58. PubMed ID: 23205407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The origins of probabilistic inference in human infants. Denison S; Xu F Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 24384147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oaksford M; Chater N Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Another chance for good reasoning. Pighin S; Tentori K; Girotto V Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1995-2002. PubMed ID: 28265865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A description-experience gap in statistical intuitions: Of smart babies, risk-savvy chimps, intuitive statisticians, and stupid grown-ups. Schulze C; Hertwig R Cognition; 2021 May; 210():104580. PubMed ID: 33667974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relational reasoning and generalization using nonsymbolic neural networks. Geiger A; Carstensen A; Frank MC; Potts C Psychol Rev; 2023 Mar; 130(2):308-333. PubMed ID: 35834185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How experimental methods shaped views on human competence and rationality. Lejarraga T; Hertwig R Psychol Bull; 2021 Jun; 147(6):535-564. PubMed ID: 34843298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Infant Statisticians: The Origins of Reasoning Under Uncertainty. Denison S; Xu F Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Jul; 14(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 31185184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analysis of the effect of natural frequencies on Bayesian reasoning. McDowell M; Jacobs P Psychol Bull; 2017 Dec; 143(12):1273-1312. PubMed ID: 29048176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intuitive reasoning about probability: theoretical and experimental analyses of the "problem of three prisoners". Shimojo S; Ichikawa SI Cognition; 1989 Jun; 32(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 2752704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pure reasoning in 12-month-old infants as probabilistic inference. Téglás E; Vul E; Girotto V; Gonzalez M; Tenenbaum JB; Bonatti LL Science; 2011 May; 332(6033):1054-9. PubMed ID: 21617069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Don't throw the associative baby out with the Bayesian bathwater: Children are more associative when reasoning retrospectively under information processing demands. Benton DT; Kamper D; Beaton RM; Sobel DM Dev Sci; 2024 May; 27(3):e13464. PubMed ID: 38059682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Representation facilitates reasoning: what natural frequencies are and what they are not. Hoffrage U; Gigerenzer G; Krauss S; Martignon L Cognition; 2002 Jul; 84(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 12044739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]