These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34472959)

  • 1. Attractors: Incidental values that influence forecasts of change.
    Critcher CR; Rosenzweig EL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Feb; 151(2):475-492. PubMed ID: 34472959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On making forecasts from binary sequences: Uncovering implicit cues.
    Beckstead JW; Pezzo MV
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Mar; 150(3):466-483. PubMed ID: 32852979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The wisdom of many in few: Finding individuals who are as wise as the crowd.
    Himmelstein M; Budescu DV; Ho EH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 May; 152(5):1223-1244. PubMed ID: 36862490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting attractor characteristics using Lyapunov exponents in a laser with injected signal.
    Bandy DK; Burton EKT; Hall JR; Chapman DM; Elrod JT
    Chaos; 2021 Jan; 31(1):013120. PubMed ID: 33754793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The commonness fallacy: Commonly chosen options have less choice appeal than people think.
    Reit ES; Critcher CR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 118(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 31464482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Premature predictions: Accurate forecasters are not viewed as more competent for earlier predictions.
    Mislavsky R; Gaertig C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jan; 153(1):159-170. PubMed ID: 37870813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The short-term stability of life satisfaction judgments.
    Lucas RE; Freedman VA; Cornman JC
    Emotion; 2018 Oct; 18(7):1024-1031. PubMed ID: 28872337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marine Forecasting and Fishing Safety: Improving the Fit between Forecasts and Harvester Needs.
    Finnis J; Shewmake JW; Neis B; Telford D
    J Agromedicine; 2019 Oct; 24(4):324-332. PubMed ID: 31293225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From discipline-centered rivalries to solution-centered science: Producing better probability estimates for policy makers.
    Mellers BA; Tetlock PE
    Am Psychol; 2019 Apr; 74(3):290-300. PubMed ID: 30945892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Affective forecasting as an adaptive learning process.
    Takano K; Ehring T
    Emotion; 2024 Apr; 24(3):795-807. PubMed ID: 37824221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying machine influence over human forecasters.
    Abeliuk A; Benjamin DM; Morstatter F; Galstyan A
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15940. PubMed ID: 32994447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the influence of evaluation context on judgments of effort.
    Ashburner M; Risko EF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Aug; 48(8):790-811. PubMed ID: 35758975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-validation theory: An integrative framework for understanding when thoughts become consequential.
    Briñol P; Petty RE
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Mar; 129(2):340-367. PubMed ID: 34968131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: A meta-analysis.
    Bystranowski P; Janik B; Próchnicki M; Skórska P
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 33734746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forecasting the duration of emotions: A motivational account and self-other differences.
    Mata A; Simão C; Farias AR; Steimer A
    Emotion; 2019 Apr; 19(3):503-519. PubMed ID: 29999381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament.
    Mellers B; Ungar L; Baron J; Ramos J; Gurcay B; Fincher K; Scott SE; Moore D; Atanasov P; Swift SA; Murray T; Stone E; Tetlock PE
    Psychol Sci; 2014 May; 25(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 24659192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motivated underpinnings of the impact bias in affective forecasts.
    Morewedge CK; Buechel EC
    Emotion; 2013 Dec; 13(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 23914762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When "bad" is good: How evaluative judgments eliminate the standard anchoring effect.
    Schweickart O; Tam C; Brown NR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 75(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32597668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The interpretation of "likely" depends on the context, but "70%" is 70%--right? The influence of associative processes on perceived certainty.
    Windschitl PD; Weber EU
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Nov; 25(6):1514-33. PubMed ID: 10605832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a Group Judgment Process for Forecasts of Health Care Innovations.
    Shekelle PG; Goldman DP
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Nov; 1(7):e185108. PubMed ID: 30646380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.