These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34472959)

  • 21. When and why people misestimate future feelings: Identifying strengths and weaknesses in affective forecasting.
    Lench HC; Levine LJ; Perez K; Carpenter ZK; Carlson SJ; Bench SW; Wan Y
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 May; 116(5):724-742. PubMed ID: 30604985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "Investigating the impact of early alliance on predicting subjective change at posttreatment: An evidence-based souvenir of overlooked clinical perspectives": Correction to Flückiger et al. (2019).
    J Couns Psychol; 2019 Oct; 66(5):639. PubMed ID: 31580126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Taking advice, using information and knowing what you are doing.
    Harries C; Harvey N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2000 Jun; 104(3):399-416. PubMed ID: 10900702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact bias or underestimation? Outcome specifications predict the direction of affective forecasting errors.
    Buechel EC; Zhang J; Morewedge CK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 May; 146(5):746-761. PubMed ID: 28368193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. And the winner is . . . ? Forecasting the outcome of others' competitive efforts.
    Kupor D; Brucks MS; Huang SC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):500-521. PubMed ID: 31120289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Overcorrection for Social-Categorization Information Moderates Impact Bias in Affective Forecasting.
    Lau T; Morewedge CK; Cikara M
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1340-1351. PubMed ID: 27538410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigating the impact of early alliance on predicting subjective change at posttreatment: An evidence-based souvenir of overlooked clinical perspectives.
    Flückiger C; Hilpert P; Goldberg SB; Caspar F; Wolfer C; Held J; Vîslă A
    J Couns Psychol; 2019 Oct; 66(5):613-625. PubMed ID: 30702324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attractor vicinity decay for a cellular automaton.
    Crutchfield JP; Hanson JE
    Chaos; 1993 Apr; 3(2):215-224. PubMed ID: 12780030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Forecasting one's future based on fleeting subjective experiences.
    Lerner JS; Gonzalez RM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Apr; 31(4):454-66. PubMed ID: 15743981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The first-member heuristic: Group members labeled "first" influence judgment and treatment of groups.
    Steinmetz J; Touré-Tillery M; Fishbach A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Apr; 118(4):706-719. PubMed ID: 31318227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy gains from conservative forecasting: Tests using variations of 19 econometric models to predict 154 elections in 10 countries.
    Graefe A; Green KC; Armstrong JS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209850. PubMed ID: 30629630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adaptive Anchoring Model: How Static and Dynamic Presentations of Time Series Influence Judgments and Predictions.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Tsaneva-Atanasova K; Juliusson A; Chater N
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 42(1):77-102. PubMed ID: 28382639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perspective taking failures in the valuation of mind and body.
    Jordan MR; Gebert T; Looser CE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):407-420. PubMed ID: 30802124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. When the body matches the picture: The influence of physiological arousal on subjective familiarity of novel stimuli.
    Kever A; Geers L; Carr EW; Vermeulen N; Grynberg D; Winkielman P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Jun; 47(6):759-764. PubMed ID: 34383541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of incidental emotions on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model.
    Gawronski B; Conway P; Armstrong J; Friesdorf R; Hütter M
    Emotion; 2018 Oct; 18(7):989-1008. PubMed ID: 29389208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rank-based alternatives to mean-based ensemble models of satisfaction with earnings: Comment on Putnam-Farr and Morewedge (2020).
    Wort F; Walasek L; Brown GDA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Nov; 151(11):2963-2967. PubMed ID: 36222667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the utility of population forecasts.
    Tayman J; Swanson DA
    Demography; 1996 Nov; 33(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 8939423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Judgments about judgments: the dissociation of consideration price and transaction commitment judgments.
    Janiszewski C; Lichtenstein DR; Belyavsky J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):151-64. PubMed ID: 18590371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Singular-continuous nowhere-differentiable attractors in neural systems.
    Tsuda I; Yamaguchi A
    Neural Netw; 1998 Jul; 11(5):927-937. PubMed ID: 12662794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. My imagination versus your feelings: can personal affective forecasts be improved by knowing other peoples' emotions?
    Walsh E; Ayton P
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 20025420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.