These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34472983)

  • 1. Comparison between different tonometers following intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation.
    Elfwwal MM; Elbasty MK; Khattab MF; ElShazly MI
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 34472983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of cornea on intraocular pressure measurement by ICARE PRO and ORA.
    Pluháček F; Unzeitigová A; Marešová K; Rybář J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 31779459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes.
    Bilgeç MD; Atalay E; Sözer Ö; Gürsoy H; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Keratoconus With and Without Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments.
    Mendez-Hernandez C; Arribas-Pardo P; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Fernandez-Perez C; Mendez-Fernandez R; Saenz-Frances F; Benitez-Del-Castillo JM; Garcia-Feijoo J
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Jan; 26(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 27661992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraocular Pressure Based on Dynamic Bidirectional Applanation and Air-puff Tonometry: A Comparative Study.
    Kilavuzoglu AEB; Cosar CB; Celebi AR; Al Parmak UE
    J Curr Glaucoma Pract; 2019; 13(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 31564796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tonometry after Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus.
    Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernandez C; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Benitez-Del-Castillo JM; Garcia-Feijoo J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):986-992. PubMed ID: 28858044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparation of the new rebound tonometer IOPen and the Goldmann tonometer, and their relationship to corneal properties.
    Moreno-Montañés J; Gosende I; Caire J; García-Granero M
    Eye (Lond); 2011 Jan; 25(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 20885426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals.
    Ouyang PB; Li CY; Zhu XH; Duan XC
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 22553765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer.
    Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Oct; 15(5):364-70. PubMed ID: 16988597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and Ocular Response Analyser tonometry: intraocular pressure agreement and patient preference.
    McCann P; Hogg RE; Wright DM; McGuinness B; Young IS; Kee F; Azuara-Blanco A
    Eye (Lond); 2020 Mar; 34(3):584-590. PubMed ID: 31455900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters.
    Bao F; Huang Z; Huang J; Wang J; Deng M; Li L; Yu A; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
    Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Goldmann applanation tonometry versus ocular response analyzer for intraocular pressure measurements in keratoconic eyes.
    Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Avni I; Zadok D
    Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1011-5. PubMed ID: 20539214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraocular pressure measurement by three different tonometers in primary congenital glaucoma.
    Zareei A; Razeghinejad MR; Nowroozzadeh MH; Mehrabi Y; Aghazadeh-Amiri M
    J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2015; 10(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 26005552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese.
    Lam A; Chen D; Chiu R; Chui WS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):909-14. PubMed ID: 17873777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring intraocular pressure after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation with rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernandez C; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Fernandez-Perez C; Diaz-Valle D; Garcia-Feijoo J
    Cornea; 2015 May; 34(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 25826325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.