BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34473708)

  • 1. phase1RMD: An R package for repeated measures dose-finding designs with novel toxicity and efficacy endpoints.
    Yin J; Du Y; Qin R; Shen S; Mandrekar S
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256391. PubMed ID: 34473708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
    Du Y; Yin J; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):271-286. PubMed ID: 30403559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeated measures dose-finding design with time-trend detection in the presence of correlated toxicity data.
    Yin J; Paoletti X; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
    Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):611-620. PubMed ID: 28764555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. dfpk: An R-package for Bayesian dose-finding designs using pharmacokinetics (PK) for phase I clinical trials.
    Toumazi A; Comets E; Alberti C; Friede T; Lentz F; Stallard N; Zohar S; Ursino M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Apr; 157():163-177. PubMed ID: 29477425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Case Example of Dose Optimization Using Data From Bortezomib Dose-Finding Clinical Trials.
    Lee SM; Backenroth D; Cheung YK; Hershman DL; Vulih D; Anderson B; Ivy P; Minasian L
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Apr; 34(12):1395-401. PubMed ID: 26926682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian dose-finding design incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
    Yin J; Qin R; Ezzalfani M; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 27633877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.
    Zang Y; Lee JJ; Yuan Y
    Clin Trials; 2014 Jun; 11(3):319-327. PubMed ID: 24844841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Would the Recommended Dose Have Been Different Using Novel Dose-Finding Designs? Comparing Dose-Finding Designs in Published Trials.
    Silva RB; Yap C; Carvajal R; Lee SM
    JCO Precis Oncol; 2021; 5():. PubMed ID: 34250415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology.
    Simon R; Freidlin B; Rubinstein L; Arbuck SG; Collins J; Christian MC
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Aug; 89(15):1138-47. PubMed ID: 9262252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Escalation with overdose control using all toxicities and time to event toxicity data in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
    Chen Z; Cui Y; Owonikoko TK; Wang Z; Li Z; Luo R; Kutner M; Khuri FR; Kowalski J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Mar; 37(2):322-32. PubMed ID: 24530487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Range and trend of expected toxicity level (ETL) in standard A + B designs: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.
    Chen Z; Krailo MD; Sun J; Azen SP;
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Mar; 30(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 19000782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose-finding designs using a novel quasi-continuous endpoint for multiple toxicities.
    Ezzalfani M; Zohar S; Qin R; Mandrekar SJ; Deley MC
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2728-46. PubMed ID: 23335156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose-finding based on feasibility and late-onset toxicity in adoptive cell therapy trials.
    Bagley EM; Wages NA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Mar; 34(2):151-163. PubMed ID: 36879525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. TITE-BOIN-ET: Time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes.
    Takeda K; Morita S; Taguri M
    Pharm Stat; 2020 May; 19(3):335-349. PubMed ID: 31829517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.
    Riviere MK; Yuan Y; Jourdan JH; Dubois F; Zohar S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):466-479. PubMed ID: 26988926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose-finding designs for cumulative toxicities using multiple constraints.
    Lee SM; Ursino M; Cheung YK; Zohar S
    Biostatistics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 29140414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. BOIN Suite: A Software Platform to Design and Implement Novel Early-Phase Clinical Trials.
    Zhou Y; Lin R; Kuo YW; Lee JJ; Yuan Y
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2021 Jan; 5():91-101. PubMed ID: 33439726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose-finding design using mixed-effect proportional odds model for longitudinal graded toxicity data in phase I oncology clinical trials.
    Doussau A; ThiƩbaut R; Paoletti X
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5430-47. PubMed ID: 24018535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applications of the partial-order continual reassessment method in the early development of treatment combinations.
    Wages NA; Dillon PM; Portell CA; Slingluff CL; Petroni GR
    Clin Trials; 2024 Jun; 21(3):331-339. PubMed ID: 38554038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies.
    Zang Y; Guo B; Qiu Y; Liu H; Opyrchal M; Lu X
    Clin Trials; 2024 Jun; 21(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 38205644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.