BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34473999)

  • 1. Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR).
    Shukla B; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2021 Nov; 1771():147643. PubMed ID: 34473999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of congenital blindness on the subcortical representation of speech cues.
    Jafari Z; Malayeri S
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jan; 258():401-9. PubMed ID: 24291729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
    Bidelman G; Powers L
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brainstem correlates of cochlear nonlinearity measured via the scalp-recorded frequency-following response.
    Bidelman GM; Bhagat S
    Neuroreport; 2020 Jul; 31(10):702-707. PubMed ID: 32453027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.
    Clinard CG; Hodgson SL; Scherer ME
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 18(2):355-369. PubMed ID: 27896486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
    Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults.
    Anderson S; Parbery-Clark A; Yi HG; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 21730859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aging effects on the neural representation and perception of consonant transition cues.
    Poe AA; Karawani H; Anderson S
    Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109034. PubMed ID: 38781768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation.
    Bidelman GM; Davis MK; Pridgen MH
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():149-160. PubMed ID: 29871826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
    Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aging degrades the neural encoding of simple and complex sounds in the human brainstem.
    Clinard CG; Tremblay KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):590-9; quiz 643-4. PubMed ID: 24047946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review.
    Anderson S; Kraus N
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Oct; 21(9):575-85. PubMed ID: 21241645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
    Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brainstem encoding of frequency-modulated sweeps is relevant to Mandarin concurrent-vowels identification for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Fu Z; Yang H; Chen F; Wu X; Chen J
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():123-136. PubMed ID: 31279277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.