BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34474689)

  • 1. Powerful and robust non-parametric association testing for microbiome data via a zero-inflated quantile approach (ZINQ).
    Ling W; Zhao N; Plantinga AM; Launer LJ; Fodor AA; Meyer KA; Wu MC
    Microbiome; 2021 Sep; 9(1):181. PubMed ID: 34474689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ZERO-INFLATED QUANTILE RANK-SCORE BASED TEST (ZIQRANK) WITH APPLICATION TO SCRNA-SEQ DIFFERENTIAL GENE EXPRESSION ANALYSIS.
    Ling W; Zhang W; Cheng B; Wei Y
    Ann Appl Stat; 2021 Dec; 15(4):1673-1696. PubMed ID: 35116085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Batch effects removal for microbiome data via conditional quantile regression.
    Ling W; Lu J; Zhao N; Lulla A; Plantinga AM; Fu W; Zhang A; Liu H; Song H; Li Z; Chen J; Randolph TW; Koay WLA; White JR; Launer LJ; Fodor AA; Meyer KA; Wu MC
    Nat Commun; 2022 Sep; 13(1):5418. PubMed ID: 36109499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel normalization and differential abundance test framework for microbiome data.
    Ma Y; Luo Y; Jiang H
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(13):3959-3965. PubMed ID: 32311021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comprehensive evaluation of microbial differential abundance analysis methods: current status and potential solutions.
    Yang L; Chen J
    Microbiome; 2022 Aug; 10(1):130. PubMed ID: 35986393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian variable selection for multivariate zero-inflated models: Application to microbiome count data.
    Lee KH; Coull BA; Moscicki AB; Paster BJ; Starr JR
    Biostatistics; 2020 Jul; 21(3):499-517. PubMed ID: 30590511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized quantile residuals for diagnosing zero-inflated generalized linear mixed models with applications to microbiome count data.
    Bai W; Dong M; Li L; Feng C; Xu W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):564. PubMed ID: 34823466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GMPR: A robust normalization method for zero-inflated count data with application to microbiome sequencing data.
    Chen L; Reeve J; Zhang L; Huang S; Wang X; Chen J
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4600. PubMed ID: 29629248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An omnibus test for differential distribution analysis of microbiome sequencing data.
    Chen J; King E; Deek R; Wei Z; Yu Y; Grill D; Ballman K; Stegle O
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 29040451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Zero-inflated Poisson factor model with application to microbiome read counts.
    Xu T; Demmer RT; Li G
    Biometrics; 2021 Mar; 77(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 32277466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MarZIC: A Marginal Mediation Model for Zero-Inflated Compositional Mediators with Applications to Microbiome Data.
    Wu Q; O'Malley J; Datta S; Gharaibeh RZ; Jobin C; Karagas MR; Coker MO; Hoen AG; Christensen BC; Madan JC; Li Z
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 35741811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accommodating multiple potential normalizations in microbiome associations studies.
    Song H; Ling W; Zhao N; Plantinga AM; Broedlow CA; Klatt NR; Hensley-McBain T; Wu MC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 24(1):22. PubMed ID: 36658484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Zero-Inflated gaussian mixed models for analyzing longitudinal microbiome data.
    Zhang X; Guo B; Yi N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242073. PubMed ID: 33166356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing microbiome association using integrated quantile regression models.
    Wang T; Ling W; Plantinga AM; Wu MC; Zhan X
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Jan; 38(2):419-425. PubMed ID: 34554223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Zero-inflated generalized Dirichlet multinomial regression model for microbiome compositional data analysis.
    Tang ZZ; Chen G
    Biostatistics; 2019 Oct; 20(4):698-713. PubMed ID: 29939212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large-scale benchmarking reveals false discoveries and count transformation sensitivity in 16S rRNA gene amplicon data analysis methods used in microbiome studies.
    Thorsen J; Brejnrod A; Mortensen M; Rasmussen MA; Stokholm J; Al-Soud WA; Sørensen S; Bisgaard H; Waage J
    Microbiome; 2016 Nov; 4(1):62. PubMed ID: 27884206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A quantile count model of water depth constraints on Cape Sable seaside sparrows.
    Cade BS; Dong Q
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Jan; 77(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 17976184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. STATISTICAL INFERENCE IN QUANTILE REGRESSION FOR ZERO-INFLATED OUTCOMES.
    Ling W; Cheng B; Wei Y; Willey JZ; Cheung YK
    Stat Sin; 2022 Jul; 32(3):1411-1433. PubMed ID: 36349247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian zero-inflated negative binomial regression model for the integrative analysis of microbiome data.
    Jiang S; Xiao G; Koh AY; Kim J; Li Q; Zhan X
    Biostatistics; 2021 Jul; 22(3):522-540. PubMed ID: 31844880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Zero is not absence: censoring-based differential abundance analysis for microbiome data.
    Chan LS; Li G
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 40(2):. PubMed ID: 38331411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.