These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34474773)

  • 1. Reply to letter to Editor written by Deora S, et al, regarding publication entitled "Rana N, Vijayvergiya R, Kasinadhuni G, et al. Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention. Indian Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2021.04.006".
    Vijayvergiya R
    Indian Heart J; 2021; 73(4):524. PubMed ID: 34474773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comment: Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Deora S; Choudhary R; Kaushik A
    Indian Heart J; 2021; 73(4):525-526. PubMed ID: 34474774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reply to a letter to the editor written by Phansalkar et al, regarding publication entitled "Do we need a simplified model to predict outcomes in patients hospitalized with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure? Results from The Role of Sodium in Heart Failure Outcomes Prediction ('SHOUT-PREDICTION') study. Indian Heart J. 2021;73(4):458-463. doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2021.06.007".
    Soni S; Panwar Y; Bharani A
    Indian Heart J; 2022; 74(2):152-153. PubMed ID: 35189138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from Mauritanian Coral Mounds.
    Gil M; Ramil F; AgÍs JA
    Zootaxa; 2020 Nov; 4878(3):zootaxa.4878.3.2. PubMed ID: 33311142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of radial, brachial, and femoral accesses using hemostatic devices for percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Otsuka M; Shiode N; Nakao Y; Ikegami Y; Kobayashi Y; Takeuchi A; Harima A; Higaki T; Oi K; Dai K; Kawase T; Nakama Y; Suenari K; Nishioka K; Sakai K; Shimatani Y; Masaoka Y; Inoue I
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2018 Jan; 33(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27830459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Letter by Chugh et al Regarding Article, "The Rotterdam Radial Access Research: Ultrasound-Based Radial Artery Evaluation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Coronary Procedures".
    Chugh Y; Chugh S; Kumar Chugh S
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 27406989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response by Costa et al to Letter Regarding Article, "The Rotterdam Radial Access Research: Ultrasound-Based Radial Artery Evaluation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Coronary Procedures".
    Costa F; Daemen J; Diletti R; Kauer F; Geuns RJ; Ligthart J; Witberg K; Zijlstra F; Valgimigli M; Van Mieghem NM; van Leeuwen MA
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 27406990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Letter by Ozeke et al regarding article, "Risk of acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary interventions using radial versus femoral vascular access: insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium".
    Ozeke O; Aras D; Topaloglu S
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jun; 7(3):420. PubMed ID: 24944309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Letter by Andò et al regarding article, "Risk of acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary interventions using radial versus femoral vascular access: insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium".
    Andò G; Boretti I; Tripodi R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jun; 7(3):419. PubMed ID: 24944308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transradial versus transfemoral access: The dispute continues.
    Postalian A; Krajcer Z
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):296-297. PubMed ID: 32797743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study.
    Fastner C; Behnes M; Ünsal M; El-Battrawy I; Ansari U; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Kuschyk J; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Heart Vessels; 2017 May; 32(5):520-530. PubMed ID: 27803954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of 2 devices for radial artery hemostasis after transradial coronary intervention.
    Dai N; Xu DC; Hou L; Peng WH; Wei YD; Xu YW
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2015; 30(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 24496325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.
    Andrade PB; Mattos LA; Rinaldi FS; Bienert IC; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Tebet M; Esteves V; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 27514319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
    Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention.
    Jolly SS; Cairns J; Yusuf S; Niemela K; Steg PG; Worthley M; Ferrari E; Cantor WJ; Fung A; Valettas N; Rokoss M; Olivecrona GK; Widimsky P; Cheema AN; Gao P; Mehta SR;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 63(10):954-63. PubMed ID: 24269362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
    Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Radial and Femoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Bhattarai M; Maskey A; Shah RK; Bhandari B; Adhikari C; Tamrakar R; Pandey R; Nepal H
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2020 Nov; 18(3):366-372. PubMed ID: 33210625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin.
    Baker NC; O'Connell EW; Htun WW; Sun H; Green SM; Skelding KA; Blankenship JC; Scott TD; Berger PB
    Am Heart J; 2014 Oct; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 25262264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Vascular approaches and closure devices for percutaneous coronary intervention].
    Monsegu J; Karrillon GJ; Schiano P; Ouadhour A
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2007 Dec; 56(6):263-8. PubMed ID: 17977508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.