These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34474774)

  • 1. Comment: Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Deora S; Choudhary R; Kaushik A
    Indian Heart J; 2021; 73(4):525-526. PubMed ID: 34474774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Rana N; Vijayvergiya R; Kasinadhuni G; Khanal S; Panda P
    Indian Heart J; 2021; 73(3):382-384. PubMed ID: 34154763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of radial, brachial, and femoral accesses using hemostatic devices for percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Otsuka M; Shiode N; Nakao Y; Ikegami Y; Kobayashi Y; Takeuchi A; Harima A; Higaki T; Oi K; Dai K; Kawase T; Nakama Y; Suenari K; Nishioka K; Sakai K; Shimatani Y; Masaoka Y; Inoue I
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2018 Jan; 33(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27830459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reply to letter to Editor written by Deora S, et al, regarding publication entitled "Rana N, Vijayvergiya R, Kasinadhuni G, et al. Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention. Indian Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2021.04.006".
    Vijayvergiya R
    Indian Heart J; 2021; 73(4):524. PubMed ID: 34474773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vascular Closure Devices Attenuate Femoral Access Complications of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Beraldo de Andrade P; de Ribamar Costa J; Rinaldi FS; de Castro Bienert IR; Barbosa RA; Esteves V; Tebet M; Zukowski C; Maia F; Piva E Mattos LA; Labrunie A; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 32(10):364-370. PubMed ID: 32999089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.
    Andrade PB; Mattos LA; Rinaldi FS; Bienert IC; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Tebet M; Esteves V; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 27514319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of radial access versus femoral access with the use of a vascular closure device for the prevention of vascular complications and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Téblick A; Vanderbruggen W; Vandendriessche T; Bosmans J; Haine SEF; Miljoen H; Segers V; Wouters K; Vrints C; Claeys MJ
    Acta Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 73(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 28851255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Vascular approaches and closure devices for percutaneous coronary intervention].
    Monsegu J; Karrillon GJ; Schiano P; Ouadhour A
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2007 Dec; 56(6):263-8. PubMed ID: 17977508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study.
    Fastner C; Behnes M; Ünsal M; El-Battrawy I; Ansari U; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Kuschyk J; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Heart Vessels; 2017 May; 32(5):520-530. PubMed ID: 27803954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
    Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vascular access and closure for cardiovascular intervention.
    Dorman SH; Obaid DR
    Heart; 2019 Aug; 105(16):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 31118197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radial versus femoral access.
    Rao SV; Turi ZG; Wong SC; Brener SJ; Stone GW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(17 Suppl):S11-20. PubMed ID: 24135659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of 2 devices for radial artery hemostasis after transradial coronary intervention.
    Dai N; Xu DC; Hou L; Peng WH; Wei YD; Xu YW
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2015; 30(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 24496325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Radial Access, Guided Femoral Access, and Non-Guided Femoral Access Among Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Koshy LM; Aberle LH; Krucoff MW; Hess CN; Mazzaferri E; Jolly SS; Jacobs A; Gibson CM; Mehran R; Gilchrist IC; Rao SV
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jan; 30(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 29035844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radial Versus Femoral Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: MACE Outcomes at Long-Term Follow-up.
    Campelo-Parada F; Carrié D; Bartorelli AL; Namiki A; Hovasse T; Kimura T; Serra-Peñaranda A; Varenne O; Lalmand J; Kadota K; Ikari Y; Tobaru T; Fujii K; Nakamura S; Saito S; Wijns W;
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 30(7):262-268. PubMed ID: 29958176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin.
    Baker NC; O'Connell EW; Htun WW; Sun H; Green SM; Skelding KA; Blankenship JC; Scott TD; Berger PB
    Am Heart J; 2014 Oct; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 25262264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
    Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention).
    Pandie S; Mehta SR; Cantor WJ; Cheema AN; Gao P; Madan M; Niemela K; Rao SV; Schwalm JD; Valentin V; Velianou JL; Jolly SS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 25907080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is it time to join the cult? Radial access and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Kleiman NS
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 8(6):e002745. PubMed ID: 26056250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does a vascular closure device affect the imbalance in complications between radial and femoral access?
    Turi ZG
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):855-6. PubMed ID: 27085026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.