BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34475059)

  • 1. Cancer Detection Rates in Targeted Transperineal MRI-TRUS Elastic Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsies Performed Under Local Anesthesia.
    Jacewicz M; Rud E; Galtung KF; Noor D; Baco E
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Sep; 41(9):4395-4400. PubMed ID: 34475059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multicenter transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion guided outpatient clinic prostate biopsies under local anesthesia.
    Jacewicz M; Günzel K; Rud E; Lauritzen PM; Galtung KF; Hinz S; Magheli A; Baco E
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):432.e1-432.e7. PubMed ID: 33257219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of systematic prostate biopsies when performing transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy with needle tracking-what is the additional value?
    Günzel K; Magheli A; Busch J; Baco E; Cash H; Heinrich S; Edler D; Schostak M; Borgmann H; Schlegel J; Hinz S
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Oct; 54(10):2477-2483. PubMed ID: 35877030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy.
    Baco E; Rud E; Eri LM; Moen G; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Eggesbø HB; Ukimura O
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 25862143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.
    Petov V; Bazarkin A; Morozov A; Taratkin M; Ganzha T; Danilov S; Chernov Y; Chinenov D; Rzayev R; Suvorov A; Amosov A; Fajkovic H; Enikeev D; Krupinov G
    J Endourol; 2023 Aug; 37(8):940-947. PubMed ID: 37294206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infection rate and complications after 621 transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion biopsies in local anesthesia without standard antibiotic prophylaxis.
    Günzel K; Magheli A; Baco E; Cash H; Heinrich S; Neubert H; Schlegel J; Schostak M; Henkel T; Asbach P; Hinz S
    World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3861-3866. PubMed ID: 33866401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Dehò F; Scattoni V; Maga T; Losa A; Gaboardi F; Cardone G; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 31100235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.
    Lian H; Zhuang J; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Li D; Fu Y; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
    BMC Urol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28679370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided and Systematic Biopsy of the Prostate in Biopsy-naïve Patients and Patients with Prior Biopsies.
    Preisser F; Theissen L; Wenzel M; Humke C; Bodelle B; Köllermann J; Kluth L; Banek S; Becker A; Roos F; Chun FK; Mandel P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 31296485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy.
    Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China.
    Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate cancer: diagnostic yield of modified transrectal ultrasound-guided twelve-core combined biopsy (targeted plus systematic biopsies) using prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging.
    Song C; Park SY
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Oct; 46(10):4974-4983. PubMed ID: 34181040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate?
    Exterkate L; Wegelin O; Barentsz JO; van der Leest MG; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; van Melick HHE; Somford DM
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 3(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 31239236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].
    Wang YM; Shang JW; Dong L; Liang LH; Zhao RZ; Liang C; Wang SQ; Xia W; Cheng G; Hua LX
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 45(11):942-947. PubMed ID: 37968079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic performance of MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsies vs. systematic prostate biopsies in biopsy-naïve, previous negative biopsy patients and men undergoing active surveillance.
    Borghesi M; Bianchi L; Barbaresi U; Vagnoni V; Corcioni B; Gaudiano C; Fiorentino M; Giunchi F; Chessa F; Garofalo M; Bertaccini A; Angelini S; Ercolino A; Casablanca C; Droghetti M; Golfieri R; Schiavina R
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Jun; 73(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 33769008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted Biopsy in Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels <20 ng/mL: A Single-Center Study in Northeastern China.
    Dai Z; Liu Y; Huangfu Z; Wang L; Liu Z
    Med Sci Monit; 2021 Aug; 27():e930234. PubMed ID: 34365459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further reduction of disqualification rates by additional MRI-targeted biopsy with transperineal saturation biopsy compared with standard 12-core systematic biopsies for the selection of prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.
    Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Bonekamp D; Freitag MT; Wolf MB; Alt CD; Hatiboglu G; Boxler S; Pahernik S; Roth W; Roethke MC; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Sep; 19(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 27184812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study.
    Emmett L; Buteau J; Papa N; Moon D; Thompson J; Roberts MJ; Rasiah K; Pattison DA; Yaxley J; Thomas P; Hutton AC; Agrawal S; Amin A; Blazevski A; Chalasani V; Ho B; Nguyen A; Liu V; Lee J; Sheehan-Dare G; Kooner R; Coughlin G; Chan L; Cusick T; Namdarian B; Kapoor J; Alghazo O; Woo HH; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy D; Hofman MS; Stricker P
    Eur Urol; 2021 Dec; 80(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 34465492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
    Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
    Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.