BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34475143)

  • 1. Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy (OPBC-02/ PREPEC): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial.
    Kappos EA; Schulz A; Regan MM; Moffa G; Harder Y; Ribi K; Potter S; Pusic AL; Fehr MK; Hemkens LG; Holzbach T; Farhadi J; Simonson C; Knauer M; Verstappen R; Bucher HC; Zwahlen D; Zimmermann F; Schwenkglenks M; Mucklow R; Shaw J; Bjelic-Radisic V; Chiorescu A; Chun YS; Farah S; Xiaosong C; Nigard L; Kuemmel S; Reitsamer R; Hauschild M; Fulco I; Tausch C; Fischer T; Sarlos D; Constantinescu MA; Lupatsch JE; Fitzal F; Heil J; Matrai Z; de Boniface J; Kurzeder C; Haug M; Weber WP
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e045239. PubMed ID: 34475143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.
    Roberts K; Mills N; Metcalfe C; Lane A; Clement C; Hollingworth W; Taylor J; Holcombe C; Skillman J; Fairhurst K; Whisker L; Cutress R; Thrush S; Fairbrother P; Potter S
    BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e050886. PubMed ID: 34848516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    King CA; Bartholomew AJ; Sosin M; Avila A; Famiglietti AL; Dekker PK; Perez-Alvarez IM; Song DH; Fan KL; Tousimis EA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):9150-9158. PubMed ID: 34386913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
    Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Pre-BRA (pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction EvAluation) feasibility study: protocol for a mixed-methods IDEAL 2a/2b prospective cohort study to determine the safety and effectiveness of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Harvey KL; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033641. PubMed ID: 31988232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-Term Outcomes in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Alcon A; Rosser M; Gedallovich J; Foster RD; Sbitany H; Piper ML
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Aug; 152(2):273-280. PubMed ID: 36723619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Radiation on Nipple Symmetry After Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Reconstruction: An Objective Analysis.
    Brown CA; Carlson GW
    Ann Plast Surg; 2024 Apr; 92(4):379-382. PubMed ID: 38527341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acute Postoperative Complications in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Avila A; Bartholomew AJ; Sosin M; Deldar R; Griffith KF; Willey SC; Song DH; Fan KL; Tousimis EA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):715e-720e. PubMed ID: 33234947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique.
    Toh U; Takenaka M; Iwakuma N; Akagi Y
    Surg Today; 2021 Jun; 51(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 33185799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision Rates in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
    Patel AA; Cemaj SL; Martin SA; Cheesborough JE; Lee GK; Nazerali RS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 May; 86(5S Suppl 3):S409-S413. PubMed ID: 33833169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct-to-Implant Extracellular Matrix Hammock-based Breast Reconstruction; Prepectoral or Subpectoral?
    Dyrberg DL; Gunnarsson GL; Bille C; Sørensen JA; Thomsen JB
    Trials; 2020 Feb; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 32041661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing and Skin-Sparing Mastectomy in Breast-Augmented Patients: Prepectoral or Submuscular Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction?
    Salgarello M; Fabbri M; Visconti G; Barone Adesi L
    Aesthet Surg J; 2024 Apr; 44(5):503-515. PubMed ID: 38150292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prepectoral versus subpectoral two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: U.S. medical center experience and narrative review.
    Escandón JM; Weiss A; Christiano JG; Langstein HN; Escandón L; Prieto PA; Gooch JC; Manrique OJ
    Ann Transl Med; 2023 Dec; 11(12):411. PubMed ID: 38213807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective comparison study of early functional outcomes after implant-based breast reconstruction: subpectoral versus prepectoral technique.
    Lee JS; Park E; Lee JH; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD; Jung TD
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Mar; 10(3):2520-2529. PubMed ID: 33691448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ostapenko E; Nixdorf L; Devyatko Y; Exner R; Wimmer K; Fitzal F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):126-136. PubMed ID: 36245049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Study of Nipple-Areola Complex Position and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Mastectomy and Immediate Expander-Implant Reconstruction Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Kim H; Park SJ; Woo KJ; Bang SI
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Apr; 43(2):313-327. PubMed ID: 30746565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of subpectoral versus dual-plane implant based immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-areola sparing mastectomy.
    Ozgur I; Kurul S; Bademler S; Karanlik H
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2021 Dec; 66(6):447-458. PubMed ID: 33223365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing Nipple-sparing Mastectomy to Secondary Nipple Reconstruction: A Multi-institutional Study.
    Santosa KB; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Pusic AL; Chun YS; Wilkins EG; Kozlow JH
    Ann Surg; 2021 Aug; 274(2):390-395. PubMed ID: 31469747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.