These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34475476)

  • 1. Testing covariance models for MEG source reconstruction of hippocampal activity.
    O'Neill GC; Barry DN; Tierney TM; Mellor S; Maguire EA; Barnes GR
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17615. PubMed ID: 34475476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hierarchical multiscale Bayesian algorithm for robust MEG/EEG source reconstruction.
    Cai C; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():698-715. PubMed ID: 30059734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A unified view on beamformers for M/EEG source reconstruction.
    Westner BU; Dalal SS; Gramfort A; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Oostenveld R; Schoffelen JM
    Neuroimage; 2022 Feb; 246():118789. PubMed ID: 34890794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical Bayes evaluation of fused EEG-MEG source reconstruction: Application to auditory mismatch evoked responses.
    Lecaignard F; Bertrand O; Caclin A; Mattout J
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117468. PubMed ID: 33075561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modified covariance beamformer for solving MEG inverse problem in the environment with correlated sources.
    Kuznetsova A; Nurislamova Y; Ossadtchi A
    Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117677. PubMed ID: 33385549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A unified Bayesian framework for MEG/EEG source imaging.
    Wipf D; Nagarajan S
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):947-66. PubMed ID: 18602278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A probabilistic algorithm integrating source localization and noise suppression for MEG and EEG data.
    Zumer JM; Attias HT; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):102-15. PubMed ID: 17574444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sparse weightings for collapsing inverse solutions to cortical parcellations optimize M/EEG source reconstruction accuracy.
    Korhonen O; Palva S; Palva JM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Apr; 226():147-160. PubMed ID: 24509129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatio-temporal Reconstruction of Neural Sources Using Indirect Dominant Mode Rejection.
    Jafadideh AT; Asl BM
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Jul; 31(4):591-607. PubMed ID: 29704076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Source localization with MEG data: A beamforming approach based on covariance thresholding.
    Zhang J; Liu C; Green G
    Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 24350784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of beamformer implementations for MEG source localization.
    Jaiswal A; Nenonen J; Stenroos M; Gramfort A; Dalal SS; Westner BU; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Schoffelen JM; Witton C; Oostenveld R; Parkkonen L
    Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116797. PubMed ID: 32278091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of EEG and MEG source imaging accuracy in reconstructing extended cortical sources.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7013-6. PubMed ID: 22255953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance analysis of reduced-rank beamformers for estimating dipole source signals using EEG/MEG.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A; Dogandzić A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):840-4. PubMed ID: 16686406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Algorithmic procedures for Bayesian MEG/EEG source reconstruction in SPM.
    López JD; Litvak V; Espinosa JJ; Friston K; Barnes GR
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():476-87. PubMed ID: 24041874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Sep; 23(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20640882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.