These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34477482)

  • 21. Opportunities and limitations for intersection collision intervention-A study of real world 'left turn across path' accidents.
    Sander U
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):342-355. PubMed ID: 28043070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Carroll J; Wisch M; Zander O; Lubbe N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S2-S11. PubMed ID: 26027971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influences of pre-crash braking induced dummy - forward displacements on dummy behaviour during EuroNCAP frontal crashtest.
    Woitsch G; Sinz W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():268-75. PubMed ID: 24211558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantifying Vision Zero: Crash avoidance in rural and motorway accident scenarios by combination of ACC, AEB, and LKS projected to German accident occurrence.
    Stark L; Düring M; Schoenawa S; Maschke JE; Do CM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S126-S132. PubMed ID: 31381430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Wisch M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S173-82. PubMed ID: 25307384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Testing the acceptability of motorcycle-AEB system: Use of unanticipated interventions as a reliable surrogate of genuinely unexpected events.
    Huertas-Leyva P; Savino G; Baldanzini N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(2):132-139. PubMed ID: 36697386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of autonomous emergency braking in car-to-cyclist accidents in France.
    Chajmowicz H; Saadé J; Cuny S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S20-S25. PubMed ID: 31750740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adaptive autonomous emergency braking model based on weather conditions.
    Han L; Fang R; Zhang H; Liu G; Zhu C; Chi R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(7):609-617. PubMed ID: 37436276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differential benefit of sensor system field-of-view and range in pedestrian automated emergency braking systems.
    Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S111-S115. PubMed ID: 34469208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A robust estimation of the effects of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) based on in-depth crashes in Australia.
    Savino G; Mackenzie J; Allen T; Baldock M; Brown J; Fitzharris M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():66-72. PubMed ID: 27586105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploratory field trial of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB): Considerations on the acceptability of unexpected automatic decelerations.
    Savino G; Pierini M; Thompson J; Fitzharris M; Lenné MG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Nov; 17(8):855-62. PubMed ID: 27028899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting crash-relevant violations at stop sign-controlled intersections for the development of an intersection driver assistance system.
    Scanlon JM; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():59-65. PubMed ID: 27586104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Crash pulse optimization for occupant protection at various impact velocities.
    Ito D; Yokoi Y; Mizuno K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():260-7. PubMed ID: 25024013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trusting Other Vehicles' Automatic Emergency Braking Decreases Self-Protective Driving.
    Kinosada Y; Kobayashi T; Shinohara K
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):880-895. PubMed ID: 32101470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Issues and challenges for pedestrian active safety systems based on real world accidents.
    Hamdane H; Serre T; Masson C; Anderson R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():53-60. PubMed ID: 26047007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates.
    Teoh ER
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(4):284-289. PubMed ID: 33769151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Integrated assessment of pedestrian head impact protection in testing secondary safety and autonomous emergency braking.
    Searson DJ; Anderson RW; Hutchinson TP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Feb; 63():1-8. PubMed ID: 24246294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes.
    Fildes B; Keall M; Bos N; Lie A; Page Y; Pastor C; Pennisi L; Rizzi M; Thomas P; Tingvall C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():24-9. PubMed ID: 25935427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. IIHS side crash test ratings and occupant death risk in real-world crashes.
    Teoh ER; Lund AK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Oct; 12(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 21972861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.