These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34477879)

  • 1. Using Primary Reinforcement to Enhance Translatability of a Human Affect and Decision-Making Judgment Bias Task.
    Neville V; Dayan P; Gilchrist ID; Paul ES; Mendl M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Nov; 33(12):2523-2535. PubMed ID: 34477879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissecting the links between reward and loss, decision-making, and self-reported affect using a computational approach.
    Neville V; Dayan P; Gilchrist ID; Paul ES; Mendl M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jan; 17(1):e1008555. PubMed ID: 33417595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive Bias in Ambiguity Judgements: Using Computational Models to Dissect the Effects of Mild Mood Manipulation in Humans.
    Iigaya K; Jolivald A; Jitkrittum W; Gilchrist ID; Dayan P; Paul E; Mendl M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165840. PubMed ID: 27829041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Housing conditions affect rat responses to two types of ambiguity in a reward-reward discrimination cognitive bias task.
    Parker RM; Paul ES; Burman OH; Browne WJ; Mendl M
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Nov; 274():73-83. PubMed ID: 25106739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Impact of Visual Art and High Affective Arousal on Heuristic Decision-Making in Consumers.
    Kim Y; Park K; Kim Y; Yang W; Han D; Kim WS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():565829. PubMed ID: 33324278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Connection between the evaluation of positive or negative valence and verbal responses to a lexical decision making task].
    Brouillet T; Syssau A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Dec; 59(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16459896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reward Responsiveness and Inhibition Traits Differentially Predict Economic Biases in Gain and Loss Contexts.
    Fernandez KN; Lighthall NR
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1948. PubMed ID: 31507496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correction. "Affect dynamics, affective forecasting, and aging".
    Nielsen L; Knutson B; Carstensen LL
    Emotion; 2009 Oct; 9(5):ii. PubMed ID: 19803581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task.
    MacLellan A; Resasco A; Young L; Mason G
    J Vis Exp; 2022 Mar; (181):. PubMed ID: 35311816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cancer blues? A promising judgment bias task indicates pessimism in nude mice with tumors.
    Resasco A; MacLellan A; Ayala MA; Kitchenham L; Edwards AM; Lam S; Dejardin S; Mason G
    Physiol Behav; 2021 Sep; 238():113465. PubMed ID: 34029586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The structure underlying core affect and perceived affective qualities of human vocal bursts.
    Grollero D; Petrolini V; Viola M; Morese R; Lettieri G; Cecchetti L
    Cogn Emot; 2023 Feb; 37(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 36300588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Striatal Beta Oscillation and Neuronal Activity in the Primate Caudate Nucleus Differentially Represent Valence and Arousal Under Approach-Avoidance Conflict.
    Amemori KI; Amemori S; Gibson DJ; Graybiel AM
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():89. PubMed ID: 32116529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reward and punisher experience alter rodent decision-making in a judgement bias task.
    Neville V; King J; Gilchrist ID; Dayan P; Paul ES; Mendl M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11839. PubMed ID: 32678247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Affect dynamics, affective forecasting, and aging.
    Nielsen L; Knutson B; Carstensen LL
    Emotion; 2008 Jun; 8(3):318-30. PubMed ID: 18540748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of valence and arousal on affective priming vary with the degree of affective experience denoted by words.
    Yao Z; Wang Y; Lu B; Zhu X
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jun; 140():15-25. PubMed ID: 30959075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reward and avoidance learning in the context of aversive environments and possible implications for depressive symptoms.
    Sebold M; Garbusow M; Jetzschmann P; Schad DJ; Nebe S; Schlagenhauf F; Heinz A; Rapp M; Romanczuk-Seiferth N
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Aug; 236(8):2437-2449. PubMed ID: 31254091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotion and working memory: evidence for domain-specific processes for affective maintenance.
    Mikels JA; Reuter-Lorenz PA; Beyer JA; Fredrickson BL
    Emotion; 2008 Apr; 8(2):256-66. PubMed ID: 18410199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Mathematical Model Captures the Structure of Subjective Affect.
    Mattek AM; Wolford GL; Whalen PJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 May; 12(3):508-526. PubMed ID: 28544868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential impact of beliefs on valence and arousal.
    Nicolle A; Goel V
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 22783982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Affective state influences perception by affecting decision parameters underlying bias and sensitivity.
    Lynn SK; Zhang X; Barrett LF
    Emotion; 2012 Aug; 12(4):726-36. PubMed ID: 22251054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.