155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34479459)
1. 3D pull-out finite element simulation of the pedicle screw-trabecular bone interface at strain rates.
Çetin A; Bircan DA
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Jan; 236(1):134-144. PubMed ID: 34479459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Individualized prediction of pedicle screw fixation strength with a finite element model.
Widmer J; Fasser MR; Croci E; Spirig J; Snedeker JG; Farshad M
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Mar; 23(4):155-167. PubMed ID: 31910656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of screw tunnels on the biomechanical stability of vertebral body after pedicle screws removal: a finite element analysis.
Liu JM; Zhang Y; Zhou Y; Chen XY; Huang SH; Hua ZK; Liu ZL
Int Orthop; 2017 Jun; 41(6):1183-1187. PubMed ID: 28353052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Homogenized finite element models can accurately predict screw pull-out in continuum materials, but not in porous materials.
Einafshar M; Hashemi A; van Lenthe GH
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Apr; 202():105966. PubMed ID: 33662802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modelling tri-cortical pedicle screw fixation in thoracic vertebrae under osteoporotic condition: A finite element analysis based on computed tomography.
Zhang W; Zhao J; Li L; Yu C; Zhao Y; Si H
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Apr; 187():105035. PubMed ID: 31443980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of screw position on load transfer in lumbar pedicle screws: a non-idealized finite element analysis.
Newcomb AG; Baek S; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Feb; 20(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 27454197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis on of anterior transpedicular screw-fixation after two-level cervical corpectomy using finite element method.
Zhao L; Chen J; Liu J; Elsamaloty L; Liu X; Li J; Elgafy H; Zhang J; Wang L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Dec; 60():76-82. PubMed ID: 30326320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw placement: a feasibility study.
Wagnac E; Michardière D; Garo A; Arnoux PJ; Mac-Thiong JM; Aubin CE
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 158():167-71. PubMed ID: 20543418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selection of suitable pedicle screw for degenerated cortical and cancellous bone of human lumbar spine: A finite element study.
Jain P; Khan MR
Int J Artif Organs; 2021 May; 44(5):361-366. PubMed ID: 33045876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Micro-CT and micro-FE analysis of pedicle screw fixation under different loading conditions.
Chevalier Y; Matsuura M; Krüger S; Fleege C; Rickert M; Rauschmann M; Schilling C
J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():204-211. PubMed ID: 29336820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of pullout strength in different designs of pedicle screws for osteoporotic bone quality using finite element analysis.
Yang SC; Liu PH; Tu YK
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(3):57-66. PubMed ID: 31798015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test.
Song M; Sun K; Li Z; Zong J; Tian X; Ma K; Wang S
Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):12968. PubMed ID: 34155224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the bending performance of solid and cannulated spinal pedicle screws using finite element analyses and biomechanical tests.
Shih KS; Hsu CC; Hou SM; Yu SC; Liaw CK
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Sep; 37(9):879-84. PubMed ID: 26208430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical characteristics of cancellous screw in different bone densities].
Tian C; Zhang MC; Ouyang J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2466-8. PubMed ID: 21097407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel parameter for the prediction of pedicle screw fixation in cancellous bone - A biomechanical study on synthetic foam.
Weidling M; Oefner C; Schoenfelder S; Heyde CE
Med Eng Phys; 2020 May; 79():44-51. PubMed ID: 32197920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite element analysis of the effects of pedicle screw fixation nut loosening on lumbar interbody fusion based on the elasto-plateau plasticity of bone characteristics.
Kim Y; Kim TW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 20139810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental investigation of pull-out performance of pedicle screws at different polyurethane (PU) foam densities.
Çetin A; Bircan DA
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Jun; 235(6):709-716. PubMed ID: 33730935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thoracic pedicle screw fixation under axial and perpendicular loadings: A comprehensive numerical analysis.
Bianco RJ; Arnoux PJ; Mac-Thiong JM; Aubin CE
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Aug; 68():190-196. PubMed ID: 31238188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Traditional and cortical trajectory screws of static and dynamic lumbar fixation- a finite element study.
Liu CW; Wang LL; Xu YK; Chen CM; Wang JC; Tsai WT; Lin SC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jul; 21(1):463. PubMed ID: 32664920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pull out Strength of Dual Outer Diameter Pedicle Screws Compared to Uncemented and Cemented Standard Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical in vitro Study.
Lorenz A; Leichtle CI; Frantz S; Bumann M; Tsiflikas I; Shiozawa T; Leichtle UG
Orthop Surg; 2017 May; 9(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 28547867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
