141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34480083)
1. Artificial intelligence for target prostate biopsy outcomes prediction the potential application of fuzzy logic.
Checcucci E; Rosati S; De Cillis S; Vagni M; Giordano N; Piana A; Granato S; Amparore D; De Luca S; Fiori C; Balestra G; Porpiglia F
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Feb; 25(2):359-362. PubMed ID: 34480083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of classical transrectal prostate biopsy versus cognitive registration in rebiopsy.
Barbas Bernardos G; Herranz Amo F; de Miguel Campos E; Luis Cardo A; Herranz Arriero A; Cancho Gil MJ; Caño Velasco J; Jara Rascón J; Mayor de Castro J; Hernández Fernández C
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019 Jun; 43(5):228-233. PubMed ID: 30833102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Value of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Improving the Detection of Anterior Prostate Cancer.
Zugor V; Kühn R; Engelhard K; Poth S; Bernat MM; Porres D; Labanaris AP
Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4279-83. PubMed ID: 27466544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early experience with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies under visual transrectal ultrasound guidance in patients suspicious for prostate cancer undergoing repeated biopsy.
Boesen L; Noergaard N; Chabanova E; Logager V; Balslev I; Mikines K; Thomsen HS
Scand J Urol; 2015 Feb; 49(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 24922550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted Biopsy in Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels <20 ng/mL: A Single-Center Study in Northeastern China.
Dai Z; Liu Y; Huangfu Z; Wang L; Liu Z
Med Sci Monit; 2021 Aug; 27():e930234. PubMed ID: 34365459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining Prostate Health Index density, magnetic resonance imaging and prior negative biopsy status to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Druskin SC; Tosoian JJ; Young A; Collica S; Srivastava A; Ghabili K; Macura KJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Sokoll LJ; Ross AE; Pavlovich CP
BJU Int; 2018 Apr; 121(4):619-626. PubMed ID: 29232037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?
Polanec SH; Bickel H; Wengert GJ; Arnoldner M; Clauser P; Susani M; Shariat SF; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e1-157.e7. PubMed ID: 31690449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.
Castellucci R; Linares Quevedo AI; Sánchez Gómez FJ; Díez Rodríguez J; Cogorno L; Cogollos Acuña I; Salmerón Béliz I; Muñoz Fernández de Legaría M; Martínez Piñeiro L
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):589-595. PubMed ID: 29094851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive Parameters Identifying Men Eligible for a Sole MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Targeted Biopsy without an Additional Systematic Biopsy.
Günzel K; Haas M; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Buckendahl J; Asbach P; Miller K; Kempkensteffen C; Cash H
Urol Int; 2017; 98(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 27618633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between "In-bore" MRI guided prostate biopsy and standard ultrasound guided biopsy in the patient with suspicious prostate cancer: Preliminary results.
D'Agostino D; Mineo Bianchi F; Romagnoli D; Corsi P; Giampaoli M; Schiavina R; Brunocilla E; Artibani W; Porreca A
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2019 Jul; 91(2):. PubMed ID: 31266272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy.
Deniffel D; Perlis N; Ghai S; Girgis S; Healy GM; Fleshner N; Hamilton R; Kulkarni G; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7544-7554. PubMed ID: 35507051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting the Need for Biopsy to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-detected Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System/Likert ≥3 Lesion: Development and Multinational External Validation of the Imperial Rapid Access to Prostate Imaging and Diagnosis Risk Score.
Peters M; Eldred-Evans D; Kurver P; Falagario UG; Connor MJ; Shah TT; Verhoeff JJC; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Montoya Perez I; Ettala O; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Briganti A; Lantz A; Picker W; Haug ES; Nordström T; Tanaka MB; Reddy D; Bass E; van Rossum PSN; Wong K; Tam H; Winkler M; Gordon S; Qazi H; Boström PJ; Jambor I; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol; 2022 Nov; 82(5):559-568. PubMed ID: 35963650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
