BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34481537)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia with pegfilgrastim in docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil therapy for esophageal cancer.
    Ichimura T; Nomura H; Shimizu H; Machida Y; Suzuki K
    Pharmazie; 2021 Sep; 76(9):450-454. PubMed ID: 34481537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk factors for febrile neutropenia and effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in patients with esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil.
    Ohkura Y; Ueno M; Udagawa H
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jul; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 31315622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Pegfilgrastim for Preventing Febrile Neutropenia During Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil Therapy for Esophageal Cancer.
    Kurogochi T; Matsumoto A; Nyumura Y; Tanishima Y; Nakayoshi T; Okamoto T; Yano F; Eto K
    Anticancer Res; 2023 May; 43(5):2293-2298. PubMed ID: 37097646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review.
    Gebremariam GT; Fentie AM; Beyene K; Sander B; Gebretekle GB
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1600. PubMed ID: 36585648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pegfilgrastim for the management of neutropenia during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in esophageal cancer patients.
    Yoshimoto T; Oshima T; Fukada T; Imamura N; Nakanishi T; Ebisutani N; Morishita D; Mieno M; Nakai K; Sei H; Kitayama Y; Eda H; Okugawa T; Tomita T; Fukui H; Shinzaki S
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2024 Feb; 29(2):142-148. PubMed ID: 38063978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis treatment strategies for febrile neutropenia in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Parthan A; Walli-Attaei M; Chandler DB; Lyman GH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 24657302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil with pegfilgrastim on day 3 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.
    Maeda O; Furune S; Kanda M; Miyata K; Shimizu D; Sugita S; Nishida K; Ando M; Kodera Y; Ando Y
    Cancer Med; 2024 Jan; 13(2):e6974. PubMed ID: 38348961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early administration of pegfilgrastim for esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil: A phase II study.
    Ishikawa T; Yasuda T; Okayama T; Dohi O; Yoshida N; Kamada K; Uchiyama K; Takagi T; Konishi H; Shiozaki A; Fujiwara H; Konishi H; Naito Y; Teramukai S; Itoh Y
    Cancer Sci; 2019 Dec; 110(12):3754-3760. PubMed ID: 31646714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
    Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of pegfilgrastim administration in patients with esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil.
    Yoshida Y; Komori K; Aoki M; Sandou M; Takagi M; Uejima E
    Pharmazie; 2018 Oct; 73(10):613-616. PubMed ID: 30223928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestimâ„¢), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
    Danova M; Chiroli S; Rosti G; Doan QV
    Tumori; 2009; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia following frontline bendamustine plus rituximab treatment in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single center, real-life experience.
    Cerchione C; De Renzo A; Di Perna M; Della Pepa R; Pugliese N; Catalano L; Pane F; Picardi M
    Support Care Cancer; 2017 Mar; 25(3):839-845. PubMed ID: 27812763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is it reasonable to administer pegfilgrastim on day 1 of a myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen? A cost-utility analysis.
    Billingsley CC; Cohn DE; Crim AK; Li Q; O'Malley DM; Havrilesky LJ
    Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2018; 14():21-25. PubMed ID: 30104004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    McBride A; Krendyukov A; Mathieson N; Campbell K; Balu S; Natek M; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 31433700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Hill G; Barron R; Fust K; Skornicki ME; Taylor DC; Weinstein MC; Lyman GH
    J Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 17(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24028444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A single-arm, retrospective analysis of the incidence of febrile neutropenia using same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim in patients with gastrointestinal cancers treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI.
    Eckstrom J; Bartels T; Abraham I; Patel H; Elquza E; Scott AJ; Malangone S; Hollings J; McBride A
    Support Care Cancer; 2019 Mar; 27(3):873-878. PubMed ID: 30090991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany].
    Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.